Quote:
|
Originally Posted by verklingen
That very well could be! But for the sake of this thread, let us consider God as an idea rather than a personage. Something set our existence into motion, and that something is to be considered God. His personal constitution is irrelevant to the purpose of this discussion, for in dealing with these questions we are discussing the existence of God, not His nature.
|
Then stop using personal pronouns for chrissake (fucking capitalized at that). Or maybe we shouldn't play the equivocation game at all.
Quote:
|
Again, I am not interested in a theistic approach to this question. I am only concerned with logical and theoretical proofs for God's existence, not His personal qualities.
|
Proofs are for mathematics.
__________________
"If you know what life is worth, then you would look for yours right here on Earth" ~Peter Tosh
I'm in favor of it as long as it's multiple choice. ~Kurt Rambis, on drug testing
|