4nik8

Bravo.


I hate to steer off topic here, but maybe it's a little more on topic than it looks.

The sooner people realize that Democrat and Republican positions in the recent history, are just there to give the illusion of a choice, the better.
Take a hard look at the EU and compare it to what's going on here. The Official page of the SPP says that Bush DIDN'T sign it, yet the Official web page of the Canadian Prime Minister says they did. Thee SPP is a road towards the NAU.
The CFR is deeply vested into seeing this happen.
The lead speaker for the CFR is Robert Pastor. You should hear some of his ideas concerning the USA/Canada/Mexico.
"Long before the 1994 NAFTA trade agreement morphed into a plan for the NAU called the SPP (signed March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas), Dr. Robert Pastor, a member of the CFR since 1997, had already made public in August 2001, his 'blueprint' for the NAU in a book titled: Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New"
"The centerpiece of the book is a detailed proposal and specific recommendations for new institutions and 'North American policies', including plans for infrastructure and transportation, immigration and customs, a unified currency, and projects aimed to lift the poorer regions"

Once you learn about the CFR and their scary ass idea for the US, you have to look at who all are members. This brings me back to my point about Democrats and Republicans being an illusion.

Just a few :

REPUBLICANS

Fred Thompson
Rudy Giuliani
Mitt Romney
John McCain
Jim Gilmore
Newt Gingrich

DEMOCRATS

Hilary Clinton
Barack Obama
John Edwards
Joe Biden
Chris Dodd

If they're all on the same team, what makes them any different?

Author:
Richard N. Haass, President, C F R

February 17, 2006
Project Syndicate

"new mechanisms are needed for regional and global governance that include actors other than states."

"Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function."

"Globalisation thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere. Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary.

This is the mantra of the CFR ~ Globalisation through LOSS of sovereignty.

These are just a few excerpts of the rhetoric believed by these facists and promoted on their web site and to the Tri Lateral Union ( pre cursor to the North American Union) and to the leaders of the 3 countries of North America.

This is who has a MAJORITY of the Presidential Candidates as fucking MEMBERS.

Sovereignty and globalisation - Council on Foreign Relations


DON'T take my word for it. I posted the link to their site. Check it out.

__________________