View Single Post
Old 06-01-2008, 03:30 PM   #100 (permalink)
no custom. customize
snapshot's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The unOriginal Rorschach.
Posts: 18,932
Thanks: 15
Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts
Originally Posted by kamikazi89 View Post
i don't see why it HAS to be universal..that totally ignores circumstance , history and location, location, location .
"It" isn't morality (or what is moral, if you will). "It," or "they," rather, are just arguments for what is moral and/or what isn't, which could imply circumstance. They just have to be consistent and applying to everyone--that doesn't ignore circumstance, history, or location.

One person in a position where killing isn't immoral means that anyone in that same position would be allayed of the moral responsibility as well. Denying universality would mean that different people in the same position could be moral or immoral depending on opinion.

It does have to be universal in order to avoid the part where we have to decide whose opinion in more valid than anyone else's. Otherwise, it's not's that which is not a part of objective morality.
We are all atheists about most of the gods that society has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
-Richard Dawkins
snapshot is offline   Reply With Quote