Quote:
Originally Posted by John F. Kerry
stoernic u make it sound like it was agressive to russia in the first place-
not only was it totally legal , and totally defensive, but it was only 10 missle interceptors which would supposedly "neutralize" russias thousands of icbms..
the russians knew it couldnt possible be effective against them and was only designed to be used against Iran, and the principality of the whole situation makes it surprising to me that Obama would just seemingly up and do this without trying to win some substantive things in response-
i guess you dont have any particular moral desire to care about the Czech republic or Poland - because those countries are trying to move into a new era and yet they get their gas supplies cut off in mid winter and all sorts of other thuggish tactics from russia.
poland and the czechs - lets screw them, and not even consult them, and not explain to them why we are abandoning what seemed to be a strategic and moral partnership with countries in eastern europe that wanted more freedom and to be allies of the US- in exchange - not for some REAL CONCRETE movement on ISSUES OF STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE- but rather to "make the russias feel good and if they are less paranoid AND WANT TO HELP US OUT - its a bonus" - says Mr. O.
When is the Apology Tour going to end?
|
A defensive system can be an offensive system in a big hurry. Any problem with russia have only 10 "defensive" missles nearby?
The system was doubtful to work.
Iran is not a threat to Europe, the US or anyone for that matter including mother israel.
The overwhelming majority of the people of the Czech republic and Poland don't want the system deployed.
We are not concerned about any eastern european peoples freedom, we are only concered about our own interests.