This particular video deals with the Pentagon attack. This avenue of Pentagon research has never been posted or discussed here.
In the earlier days of the movement, many suspected that a missile or Global Hawk crashed into the Pentagon, and they cited photographic evidence which showed a negligibly small amount of debris which could be construed to be from a large aircraft.
However there was a serious problem: Not one eyewitness claimed to have seen such a thing, and indeed almost all eyewitnesses did see a plane approaching the building.
So two men, Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis, fed up with the speculation, decided to travel from LA all the way to Arlington VA, canvass the area and search for people who were in the area and witnessed the attack. They call themselves CIT, Citizen Investigation Team.
CIT interviews witnesses, on location, where the witness was at the time of the attack.
In short: All of the witnesses, unanimously and independently, reported the plane flying to the NORTH side of Columbia Pike and OVER the Navy Annex, and, most importantly, the NORTH side of the Citgo gas station.
This might sound like a minor detail BUT... Does anyone remember the downed light poles and taxi cab with the speared windshield supposedly from the falling light pole?
These light poles could have only been downed by the plane if the plane approached the Pentagon from the SOUTH side of Columbia Pike and SOUTH of the Citgo gas station.
CIT's first video was called PentaCon, released in early 2007. Believe it or not I did not start looking into CIT's work until a few months ago this year.
Prior to CIT, there was one person, Pentagon Police Officer William Lagasse, who was on record testifying to the North of Citgo approach, but since he was the only one, his testimony was dismissed by most researchers as probably being mistaken. However, CIT's first video has live, on location interviews, with not just Lagasse but THREE other people who were on the gas station property at the time of the attack, and all UNANIMOUSLY place the plane to the north of the station, far from the downed light poles.
Now, in this new video, their number of witnesses has shot up from 4 to 13 (yes, the animated gif shows 8).
Imagine a traffic court case where 13 witnesses said the accident happened north of the intersection and not one witness contradicted that. What would the judge/jury believe?
The rather disturbing conclusion is that the light poles and taxi cab scene had to have been staged. (CIT believes the light poles were prepared and put on the ground the night before, which would make sense.) The other conclusion is that the plane, rather than
impacting the building, FLEW OVER the building and away from it. This conclusion is due to the fact that the entire damage path, from the first light pole, to the last, to the outer ring of the building, to the exit hole in the C ring, are consistent ONLY with the SOUTH approach:
This new video even presents an eyewitness, Pentagon police officer Roosevelt Roberts, who testifies to a "commercial aircraft" flying away "ten seconds tops" after the explosion. He first testified to this in a recorded interview for the Center for Military History in late 2001. He confirmed it with CIT in 2008. At the time of both interviews, he was not aware of the implications of his testimony, thinking that what he saw was a second plane. He has since been made aware of the implications and is no longer talking.
Enjoy the video!