YaHooka Forums - View Single Post

Makros_01 · 09-26-2009, 09:22 AM

"the point as many know is that once a nation gets nuclear weapons they wont give them up - thus its horrible that n korea has them- horrible that pakistan has them- and undesireable that israel, india, america, russia, etc etc have them..." J.F.K (the yahookan)

....you forgot china. do you think china is nuke free?and its not etc etc. there are few enough to be able to list as a whole. there is no ET FUCKIN C

why is it horrible that india and pakistan have them? they never used them; in fact it seems to have stabilized the border wars they were having. And only UNDESIRABLE that the USA have them (the only people to have destroyed civilian populations with them! 100,000 even!)?

to answer hedons qu. i think iran is right to act and do as it has and will continue to. They are acting with insolence, sure. But you know, most kids who are bullied act like that as they find their bodies filling out to catch up with the bully. The sociology is the same; the equations are just a little more complicated.
No one can hold the world to ransom with a nuke. its the easiest way to get 217 countries on your back at once. even the US couldnt get away with a usage. not even one. so they made dep. uranium... bunker busters.. and they get lambasted for that too, and in the end, we all see it didnt even win the war. only lost US credit.

I want Iran with Nukes! I really do. every continent should have at least 2 forces that oppose each other idealogically that are nuclear powers. it works. we all know it works. if we get rid of every weapon of mass destruction, we'd just have what we had before. endless war (and if you look at history, its startling the difference)

we didnt get here through peace love and understanding. i concede that to JFK (not singling you out.no offence, weve just been doing this for a few threads). but we DID get here through the cold war. it was an extremely effective way to prevent millions being killed at war, now its only 10s of thousands. sounds cold and pragmatic, but its true.. its better now than then
to prevent others getting the balance in their own areas will only serve to highten the desire for stupidity.
and hey, we all know the basics and we're all human.
as for iran being a gov that doesnt represent the people?
well you know what
neither does the US gov represent ITS people. tell me im wrong. hell i dont even think the votes get counted right in your country.
over here
we still use paper, and if i wanted to . i could personally take a table and count some. you guys dont even know what the fuck is going on on your vote day.
even the independant electoral bodies found 'significant irregularities' in the 2000 bush gore election. your courts gave you your president.
if iran did that, youd condem them!
just think about that!

09-26-2009, 09:22 AM	#15 (permalink)
Makros_01 Old School Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 638 Thanks: 17 Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts	"the point as many know is that once a nation gets nuclear weapons they wont give them up - thus its horrible that n korea has them- horrible that pakistan has them- and undesireable that israel, india, america, russia, etc etc have them..." J.F.K (the yahookan) ....you forgot china. do you think china is nuke free?and its not etc etc. there are few enough to be able to list as a whole. there is no ET FUCKIN C why is it horrible that india and pakistan have them? they never used them; in fact it seems to have stabilized the border wars they were having. And only UNDESIRABLE that the USA have them (the only people to have destroyed civilian populations with them! 100,000 even!)? to answer hedons qu. i think iran is right to act and do as it has and will continue to. They are acting with insolence, sure. But you know, most kids who are bullied act like that as they find their bodies filling out to catch up with the bully. The sociology is the same; the equations are just a little more complicated. No one can hold the world to ransom with a nuke. its the easiest way to get 217 countries on your back at once. even the US couldnt get away with a usage. not even one. so they made dep. uranium... bunker busters.. and they get lambasted for that too, and in the end, we all see it didnt even win the war. only lost US credit. I want Iran with Nukes! I really do. every continent should have at least 2 forces that oppose each other idealogically that are nuclear powers. it works. we all know it works. if we get rid of every weapon of mass destruction, we'd just have what we had before. endless war (and if you look at history, its startling the difference) we didnt get here through peace love and understanding. i concede that to JFK (not singling you out.no offence, weve just been doing this for a few threads). but we DID get here through the cold war. it was an extremely effective way to prevent millions being killed at war, now its only 10s of thousands. sounds cold and pragmatic, but its true.. its better now than then to prevent others getting the balance in their own areas will only serve to highten the desire for stupidity. and hey, we all know the basics and we're all human. as for iran being a gov that doesnt represent the people? well you know what neither does the US gov represent ITS people. tell me im wrong. hell i dont even think the votes get counted right in your country. over here we still use paper, and if i wanted to . i could personally take a table and count some. you guys dont even know what the fuck is going on on your vote day. even the independant electoral bodies found 'significant irregularities' in the 2000 bush gore election. your courts gave you your president. if iran did that, youd condem them! just think about that! __________________ sometimes i'm drunk.