View Single Post
Old 10-08-2009, 05:37 PM   #157 (permalink)
zerodown
Mafutero
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PR
Posts: 782
Thanks: 41
Thanked 169 Times in 131 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ego Tripping View Post
Sooooo....sources, credibility and definition of the very thing you're touting is inevitable is irrelevant? Nice.
I'll answer you with the end of the sentence you half quoted:

"focus on the message itself. Im not saying believe what he says, im saying focus on the message, regardless of how much of a nut job you think someone is."

Thats why I said you have to research on your own, don't believe anything anyone says just like that, RESEARCH, then come to a conclusion on your own.

What you only believe "credible" sources? Like cnn or fox? Don't believe ANYONE, research on your own, then apply logic and reason.

Anyways, on with the issues that matter:

Verk I understand your point of view about the city being shut down because of protesters, BUT, if there was no summit there would be no protesters, so in my point of view(and this was only assuming what jcp said was correct) the summit is illegal, because this group of powerful leaders are shutting down a city just because they want to have a reunion in there for their own agendas. jcp stated that we cannot block a street for the monopolization of our groups regardless of the message, and the summit is, in MY view, the closing of a CITY(not a street) for the monopolization of their group, hence making it an illegal gathering according to jcp's statement.

But that was just a cheap shot I tried to make, the main point was on political campaigns, are those illegal gatherings? I don't know in your state, but in my island streets are closed for political campaigns, kids drive without their seat belts and sticking out the windows waving flags like idiots, last year some people died when they fell out of the car doing it. Shouldn't we ban this acts and political campaign gatherings all together for the safety of our people?

I think banning campaigns would be the right move, it would force people to understand politics in order to elect someone, also it would force politicians to actually work instead of relying on campaigns and their face showing up on every place possible. Plus imagine how much money would be saved.

But what do I know?

PS: flappy and ego, you just plain don't like each other, why don't you just ignore each other, you two look like children fighting, seems like you two missed my point on "attacking each other solves nothing". Try to discuss the issues without the animosity you feel towards each other and trying to demonstrate the other one is an idiot does not count as discussing the issue.
__________________
"I've seen people so poor all they got is money."

We have to learn to unlearn
Its not contradiction, its amendment
Not everything we see is reality
Not everything we hear is the truth
Not everything we're taught helps us grow
~Cultura Profetica

"La locura se lleva en la cabeza y las drogas en los bolsillos"
~Roberto Iniesta

Last edited by zerodown; 10-08-2009 at 05:41 PM.
zerodown is offline   Reply With Quote