Quote:
Originally Posted by Canuck Wisdom
When you conduct a propaganda mission you create evidence both for and against the truth of it. By doing so you gain some control over the direction of beliefs from either side.
9/11 for example; if it was a false flag attack (which I believe it was), the people behind it would also have released information to support that idea, but mislead from the truth. Or create misleading suspicions.
The video posted with the fox program feels like that to me. Trying to 'guide' our ideas on a 'moon landing hoax'.
|
So true. I love it...where does the conspiracy end, anyway? Perhaps it's an even MORE elite group trying to control those who are trying to control the very people who are trying to control us! Come on Kamee, why stop there? There's an off-planet Reptilian Species performing mind control on the most powerful leaders on Earth yet you never post about them. Why so biased? I'm being half-serious. At what point do you stop believe how deep the conspiracy goes before being considered hypocritical?
There's still no real reason to fake a moon landing SIX TIMES. I can understand once, sure, they wanted to show up the world. But five more consecutive times? The amount of energy that would be needed not only to hoax it but to keep it covered up (a god damn balloon story can't even get farther than one day before being exposed in this day and age) they could have gone there for real.
Sorry Kamee, I see your point and I truly hope it's more philosophical than literal...because if you still don't believe we have landed on the moon, then I must admit, it makes me think twice about most of what you post. Since you are alluding to the fact that you think we haven't landed, do you think we've actually made it into space? If so, why didn't we land? Perhaps you might think the Round Earth theory is also hoax and the Earth is still, indeed, flat? I'm sure you'll scoff at the mere proposal of such an accusation, but is this really such an irrational conclusion to draw if you're saying the cover-up is THIS large? I don't see why you would believe one cover-up but deny another.
As far as the photo in the OP, what's really so "fake" about it? Don't you know there's kevlar that looks relatively flimsy yet can stop a bullet? There's glue that can mount hundreds of pounds in a few seconds? There's a god damn prototype of a cloaking device that looks like a regular raincoat and you're trying to deduce off a mere photo observation that the lunar module is akin to a high school play!? That's as irrational as it gets, man. The modules are built to be lightweight yet strong and by no means are they to be aesthetically pleasing. Kamee, sometimes I think if the US didn't go to the moon, you did. Come back to Earth brother...it's not as paranoid down here as you might think.