kameelyun

But sadly, you failed to address the points raised in post 39:

http://www.yahooka.com/forum/51829993-post39.html

Let's just take one point at a time. CantSeeMe cited the bouncing lasers as proof that the manned moon landings occurred. I pointed out that (1) if there were reflectors, they could have been placed by robotic means, and (2) the reflectors are not needed anyway. As a true skeptic, I conclude that the bouncing lasers are not proof of man walking on the moon.

ET, you said that I am commenting about a subject and its technology about which I know nothing; however, as I have pointed out several times now, there are several NASA scientists from the 1960's during the development of Apollo who risked their credibility (and possibly more) to openly go on camera and state that the technology at the time was just not ready, with our program, and that to this day they feel positive it was all a hoax. It's not my idea; I'm intrigued by those who did have the expertise and were there.

Believe it or not I'm not choosing to defend one side til the point I lose; I am simply being a true skeptic who does not take official history on faith alone.

Thank you, verk, for the Clavius site. As a very seasoned 9/11 activist who knows beyond a doubt that Popular Mechanics' "debunking" literature is flawed up the wazoo (their book has been debunked six ways to Sunday), I will, on this issue, look at the debunkers, the counter-debunkers, and the counter-counter-debunkers, as thoroughly as possible, and do the best to form my own conclusions based on all available data.

__________________
"The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off." - Gloria Steinem