Quote:
Originally Posted by verklingen
science, and indeed our every perception, is much the same. we are so trained to see what "should" be there that we miss everything that is there, even while staring right at it. if something doesn't fit into our scheme it is perceived as though it does, because to perceive otherwise is uncomfortable. we fear the unknown evil more than the known, and will elect to sabotage reality before reality can sabotage our expectations and beliefs. the irony is that our expectations are sabotaging us! they sabotage our understanding by causing us to miss the evident reality, and this sabotages our happiness by leading to ignorance and misinterpretation. it makes for an unhealthy relationship with existence, like involving oneself in a personal relationship only superficially. there can only be balance between equals
and that's an interesting subject, balance. in my head the concept of balance closely approximates how i conceive non-duality. what do you think of this?
/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by verklingen
what i think all this points out is our severe bias of belief, and that is a symptom of the ego. rather than allowing them to shape and guide us, we are programmed to automatically beset our experiences against the ego's conception of self, as if to determine a victor. and in that we always lose, because all is vanity and vexation of spirit 
|
I am interested in who this 'we' is and why it comes of sounding like none of the 'wes' will ever get it? What is the positive side of all these things?
I'm interested in how 'wes' succeed rather than how 'they'll' never make it... from this out look of things.
I agree with what you are saying the stumbling blocks are, but again.... what are the positive things happening here?
And where's the "I" in the 'wes'... what do you think about you in all this and not all the wes out there
I'm sorry man but there was so many wes in there that I have to go to the bathroom or continue speaking in french.
yes yes!
SageTree
edit: of course I mean no disrespect.... I mean that to sound more playful than it might, in re-reading it.