before i respond to raretoker's post, i want to first tell raretoker that i dont mean disrespect, i just need to point out a few fallacies in your response.
[quote]Originally posted by RareToker:
<strong>
You just dont know how to roll them.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
k ur first big wrong comment. i roll sick sick sick blunts. if i do say so myself. every group of blunt smoker's i've had the pleasure to share my craft with has given me huge compliments. plus i love smoking them. so actually, i do know how to roll them, quite well.
[quote]<strong>
Phillies are terrible because they are harsh, short, and nasty. The only thing you can do w/ a philly is break it and re-roll it... there is no outter layer of 'baccy to remove and the one that is there is glued down. fuck that.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
phillies do have an outer leaf. i can peel it off without even wetting the gar. i actually like this outer leaf better than others (esp. dutchmasters, their outer leaf is why i dont like them) because it's fun and elastic. some sort of synthetically processed tobaccy substitue or something haha. either way it's a moot point because there's a point that i'm sure u'll reach someday where u roll such nice blunts with the inner leaf that it's compltely unessisary to use the outer leaves. i just chuck em now.
[quote]<strong>
Note: Green leaves are moist and clog up w/ dank... only use it w/ regs.</strong><hr></blockquote>
how do u know this? if this is so, then how would u explain all the blunts of dank that i've smoked? they all worked REALLY well. that's why i go back to them
.
again, no disrespect, but i have to defend my blunt rolling honor.