YaHooka Forums - View Single Post

**Hedons** · 11-23-2007, 11:39 PM

Here is what I found...

Saliva Tests

* Are a little more expensive than urine testing, but less than hair or blood. (~$15-$75).
* Are considered a relatively unintrusive method of drug testing.
* Are becoming more common.
* Are easy to administer but require lab processing to ensure accuracy.
* Detect use primarily within the past few days.
* Can detect more recent use than other testing methods.
* Have no nationally accepted standards or cutoff concentrations for detection, making results greatly dependent on the specific product purchased. This could also make results less-reliable and/or acceptable for legal cases.
* More reliable for detection of Methamphetamine and Opiates, less reliable for THC or Cannabinoids (2004).

11-23-2007, 11:39 PM	#3 (permalink)
Hedons Ribbed for her pleasure! Status: Offline Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Chicago Burbs. Delta(x) times Delta(p) is greater than or equal to h-bar over two. Posts: 4,627 Thanks: 22 Thanked 142 Times in 91 Posts	Here is what I found... Saliva Tests * Are a little more expensive than urine testing, but less than hair or blood. (~$15-$75). * Are considered a relatively unintrusive method of drug testing. * Are becoming more common. * Are easy to administer but require lab processing to ensure accuracy. * Detect use primarily within the past few days. * Can detect more recent use than other testing methods. * Have no nationally accepted standards or cutoff concentrations for detection, making results greatly dependent on the specific product purchased. This could also make results less-reliable and/or acceptable for legal cases. * More reliable for detection of Methamphetamine and Opiates, less reliable for THC or Cannabinoids (2004). __________________ New and improved! Now with flushable applicator.