lack of evidence is not evidence of absence. . .
in fact "evidence" is itself biased, having everything to do with objectivity: a realm of existence which comprises only a portion of the reality we experience. the subjective, though non-evident, holds just as much importance for us. thus we can only trust our evidence as far as we can throw it. . . or at the very least, only trust conclusions drawn from evidence as far as we are able to throw the things they affect. anything beyond that is fair game.
__________________
you can't explain the rules of tennis to a dog, but he runs after it and plays with it...like the dog playing with the ball, we don't have the necessary tools needed to interpret the afterlife..until we get there, then a whole new universe is given to us. Perhaps 200 billion light years away, there's the next phase of our existance..Remember you cannot destroy energy, which is all we are...
-matthew munari
rip matt
