|
All I know is no one has any lick of a chance of getting me to believe that someone who didn't exhibit any knowledge of the natural world was supposedly the so-called son of the being who was supposed to have created the natural world. Particularly when you consider that the son and the being were supposedly one in the same. That would be tantamount to the creator of the natural world not even knowing anything about what it was he created. Others might try to downplay that as being insignificant. I wholeheartedly disagree!
|