View Single Post
Old 04-28-2008, 10:08 AM   #74 (permalink)
matthewmunari
best at t.woods 2008
 
matthewmunari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,290
Blog Entries: 92
Thanks: 236
Thanked 58 Times in 52 Posts
Send a message via AIM to matthewmunari
lucy wasn't even close to being human

Quote:
Originally Posted by JcP View Post
06-11-03: 160,000-year-old skulls are oldest anatomically modern humans

unless you are arguing that fossils are not real and/or not really from the time they are from (IE: God put them there), you are wrong.

Homo Sapien fossils up to 160,000 years old have been found.

Lucy is a Australopithecus afarensis from 3.2 million years ago (3,200,000), which is a genetic precursor to the homo sapien mammal commonly called modern humans.


so I'm not sure what you're suggesting. You are either suggesting that the fossil record for HOMO SAPIENS is a trick by God, or you are confused.

If you agree that science and fossil records are real, then disagreeing with homo sapiens being at least 160,000 years old is looney. There are fossils that prove it....not fossils of evolutionary steps leading to homo sapien, but homo sapien fossils.

i don't believe that slowly but surely, over time, we are what we are what we are today..(as in our human body structure)... you cannot tell me that an ape is a genetic precursor to a human, because that's just not true... we might be similar in the # of chromosones, but humans and animals (lucy falls into that category) are two different species..Why didnt the humans that you say lived 160,000 years ago create a writing system, or make rudimentary documentation of their lineage? .. they werehumans living like animals...plain and simple

Last edited by matthewmunari; 04-28-2008 at 10:14 AM. Reason: ...
matthewmunari is offline   Reply With Quote