[tazz11]

i know welcome back ... i would like to talk about speice imprinting from piont A on ward .. . this doctrain thoery reflects my under standing of speice imprinting within the speice of cannabis , in a related sequence of the human speice ,...

it is my under standing that as is the human speice a peak of living structure as is the cannabis the refelction of a peak in plant speice...

we have failed to under stand the starting point A of this speiec and . this has reflected our lack of a tatol under standing of plant imprinting from piont A onward ...

we see the basic yet where do they start and end ... this is the question few find them selfs able to answer .. so here is my thoery as to how these imprintings take place and why ...

so what is piont A . the harvesting piont of viable seed...


under standing that seeds are part of a genetic growth loop that relates to it self threw out the speice life cycle, and beyond as its plant fails and become its own fertilization compost of urea nitrogens along with othe boi chem ...


the piont A is yet a place on the genetic life cycle that we can define as a starting piont to build a under standing of the sequences of imprinting that talk place from beyond the seed structure to the plants genders and production of new seed ...

now we find our selfs asking if this is piont A and we under stand we have a seedling fetus what can the postioning of the fetus tell us and what part dose this postioning play in the imprinting of the seedling fetus ...to make things easy i will refer to the seedling fetus as the SF from this piont on ..

we find the SF fully developed and awaiting germanation , so if this is the case the imprinting has most likely already taken place in part before this piont ... if this is the case we must look at the span of development before piont A ...what takes polace when the genders produce the seed and what takes place withing the seed...we know genders place a even balanceing act in a speices . we often beleive that because a female gender may out number the male gender of off spring that the genders are uneven to promote breeding between the gender ratio ,, IMHO this is misleeding ,and is not what is takeing place at all .. the un even numbers between gender off spring reflect the ratio of genetic purityof the speice strain base and not that of the speice it self .. let me explan .. say a set of off spring has 25 males and 35 females ... it dose not mean the females are the dominant gender , if fact it has little to do with that at all ...

the purity rates of the females is lower then the male thus the numbers do not reflect the ablities of the off spring to carry on the strain base ...


so even if the number of females is higher then that of the male the males reflect and stronger strain imprinting ...thus gender ratio has little meaning to the over all strain base qualities . yet do in many ways effect the strain base in mass or set groups as what we often see in the common growing environments ...


now we must ask our selfs if this is the case and we were leed to beleive something that is not the case at all then what can we learn from the under stand of this new thoery and how it reflects the sequences of this speice and other speices with in creation it self ...


i must take a brake ,and please do not reply at this piont i will take question after the doctrain is complete .. thank you ...