YaHooka Forums - View Single Post

tazz11 · 05-16-2008, 07:18 PM

so now what we beleived was setting the quality of the imprinting is not the case at all this explans the reason for the failing genetic gene pool in the speice .. we as grower as have selected a imbalance as our goal and thus the speice is reflecting the imbalance even at the piont of conditioning the strain base to a unstablized gender reflection with in the strain base so baddly out of control it now shows in the speice at all levels ...

yet if we truely under stand the Piont A and what it means we can still hopefully correct what we have done to this speice , and we may even under stand and learn something about the human speice at the same time ...

it is not the goal to regress the cannabis strain to the piont of hemp . yet if we are to truely under stand this new thoery of imprinting as a focus piont A and with a under standing that piont A is not a fixed piont it is a ever growing place in the ever changeing cycle of this speice and each strain base within this speice has this piont A .. it may not be the same day or and time yet .. each strain base within the speices has this Piont A and we can use it to under stand how the over all mass reacts to the cycle and enivronments as well as our conditioning of the strains effect the gender balances within the grow and the strain and mass . these things effect the speice as a whole ...
say a batch of seed produces the 25 males and 35 females stated . the males have a rateing of say 60% purity and the females have a 45% purity .. , now before you become confused i well explan how this works , you are most likely thinking how can there be 60% and 45 % is that not more then 100% yes , why do you ask ... the female mother that made the seed in the frist place was not a balanced stablized gender with in its off spring .. thus it has reflected the imbalnce to the breeding of this seed.....

thus what should be a even ratio in purities is not takeing place in this condition ...

thus we may have a strong male from the over spring but it would be balanced with a female of 40% purities and not the selected 45 % purities of the mated female in this case .. thus the imbalnce becomes part of the new seed and well be reflected in the seedlings of the batch of seed .....

question 1, i ask you , if you get a batch of seed and you get 5 males and 5 females .. is that strain balnced ...?

the answer is...No ...

how do we know ... the number of females verses males dose not reflect the purities it reflects the mateable genders in ratio not purities ...

thus if this strain was a balanced strain base it most likely would reflect a ratio of more females then males , this is a push pull effect between genders vs ratio of numbers .. the out come become a balanceing facter in the strain ,mass and speice ...

so we now look back at the piont A ...can we define the off spring by the number of seeds vs their ratio of genders they reflect when they show their genders ... if so why ...?

No , in fact we only can define the purities of the genders by ratio not by the numbers of a given set of off spring , this is why the viger of F1 is reflected , in strain bases that have no balnce between them when two diffrent strain bases mate , why you ask . this reflects the two diffrent strain bases vs two stable strain bases, mainly IBL strain bases ...

this is reflecting the truth of the theory that two IBL strain bases that are mated for the frist time reflect a even balance in their own strain base and this is the true reason why F1 viger is most often noticeable in frist time mateings of two diffrent IBLs.. and this is the reason why the Piont A become a balanceing under standing in how strain bases reflect their imprinting , so even if the IBL dose not become its own fertilizers . it dose reflect a balanced conditioning to its environments and this conditioning is reflected in a stablized gender ratio in trun becomeing the balanceing facter of the purites of the gender within the strain base from that basic under standing we can now see the importence of piont A .. even it if there is no set piont .. the under standing of piont A reflects a sequence of gender stablization that when under stood in this new thoery defines the stablization of the the whole speice it self as well as the over all gene pool ...

by defineing a set piont and calling it piont A it gives us a refence piont to under stand the imprinting that is takeing place we can not see .. yet the basics for a under standing can be given new insight , do you want to go around and around all your life or would you like to find a way to under stand the complex balances that make upo the speice and the strain bases within the masses ...

it all starts with saying this is piont A ....with in a never ending cycle

05-16-2008, 07:18 PM	#2 (permalink)
tazz11 Old School Join Date: May 2001 Location: ny Posts: 1,308 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	so now what we beleived was setting the quality of the imprinting is not the case at all this explans the reason for the failing genetic gene pool in the speice .. we as grower as have selected a imbalance as our goal and thus the speice is reflecting the imbalance even at the piont of conditioning the strain base to a unstablized gender reflection with in the strain base so baddly out of control it now shows in the speice at all levels ... yet if we truely under stand the Piont A and what it means we can still hopefully correct what we have done to this speice , and we may even under stand and learn something about the human speice at the same time ... it is not the goal to regress the cannabis strain to the piont of hemp . yet if we are to truely under stand this new thoery of imprinting as a focus piont A and with a under standing that piont A is not a fixed piont it is a ever growing place in the ever changeing cycle of this speice and each strain base within this speice has this piont A .. it may not be the same day or and time yet .. each strain base within the speices has this Piont A and we can use it to under stand how the over all mass reacts to the cycle and enivronments as well as our conditioning of the strains effect the gender balances within the grow and the strain and mass . these things effect the speice as a whole ... say a batch of seed produces the 25 males and 35 females stated . the males have a rateing of say 60% purity and the females have a 45% purity .. , now before you become confused i well explan how this works , you are most likely thinking how can there be 60% and 45 % is that not more then 100% yes , why do you ask ... the female mother that made the seed in the frist place was not a balanced stablized gender with in its off spring .. thus it has reflected the imbalnce to the breeding of this seed..... thus what should be a even ratio in purities is not takeing place in this condition ... thus we may have a strong male from the over spring but it would be balanced with a female of 40% purities and not the selected 45 % purities of the mated female in this case .. thus the imbalnce becomes part of the new seed and well be reflected in the seedlings of the batch of seed ..... question 1, i ask you , if you get a batch of seed and you get 5 males and 5 females .. is that strain balnced ...? the answer is...No ... how do we know ... the number of females verses males dose not reflect the purities it reflects the mateable genders in ratio not purities ... thus if this strain was a balanced strain base it most likely would reflect a ratio of more females then males , this is a push pull effect between genders vs ratio of numbers .. the out come become a balanceing facter in the strain ,mass and speice ... so we now look back at the piont A ...can we define the off spring by the number of seeds vs their ratio of genders they reflect when they show their genders ... if so why ...? No , in fact we only can define the purities of the genders by ratio not by the numbers of a given set of off spring , this is why the viger of F1 is reflected , in strain bases that have no balnce between them when two diffrent strain bases mate , why you ask . this reflects the two diffrent strain bases vs two stable strain bases, mainly IBL strain bases ... this is reflecting the truth of the theory that two IBL strain bases that are mated for the frist time reflect a even balance in their own strain base and this is the true reason why F1 viger is most often noticeable in frist time mateings of two diffrent IBLs.. and this is the reason why the Piont A become a balanceing under standing in how strain bases reflect their imprinting , so even if the IBL dose not become its own fertilizers . it dose reflect a balanced conditioning to its environments and this conditioning is reflected in a stablized gender ratio in trun becomeing the balanceing facter of the purites of the gender within the strain base from that basic under standing we can now see the importence of piont A .. even it if there is no set piont .. the under standing of piont A reflects a sequence of gender stablization that when under stood in this new thoery defines the stablization of the the whole speice it self as well as the over all gene pool ... by defineing a set piont and calling it piont A it gives us a refence piont to under stand the imprinting that is takeing place we can not see .. yet the basics for a under standing can be given new insight , do you want to go around and around all your life or would you like to find a way to under stand the complex balances that make upo the speice and the strain bases within the masses ... it all starts with saying this is piont A ....with in a never ending cycle __________________ yahooka's rainman! Last edited by tazz11; 05-17-2008 at 05:38 AM.