View Single Post
Old 07-03-2008, 04:58 AM   #9 (permalink)
generic_hippie
question authority
 
generic_hippie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 20 km's from Nimbin, Australia
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 61
Thanked 190 Times in 139 Posts
Send a message via MSN to generic_hippie
the things wrong with it are myriad dude

why should one person who works 50 -60 hours a week be paid more than somebody else who is just as committed to their (less worthy) job if the choices that put each of the respective employees in their respective positions was not either of theirs?

its called equity dubstyle, read about it

you talk about fair because of percentages, for me fair comes down to food on the table and a roof over the heads of the lesser paid individual

the guy earning a salary in the 100K+ range is still able to live, feed and house his family in a more expensive manner after his 60 hours and in your opinion, excessive tax, why should he not pay if he can?

Should his commitment to luxury for him and his family come before food for the poor people in society who don't have the opportunity to earn 6 figure salaries?

No, not in a FAIR society, they should not.
__________________
All we are saying is give
POT
to everybody all the time...
generic_hippie is offline   Reply With Quote