|
"It's a pretty known fact that species adapt, that's not the argument or the problem. It's when you say one species changes into another. Primates to human, dinosaurs to birds, etc.. If Evolution does occur, where does ALL the extra information come from to make these changes? Entropy states we should be decaying, not advancing in Evolution."
This is simple case of you haveing the wrong information. Adaptaion and evolution are NOT very different processes. In fact, adaptation is the very core of evoltuion. This adaptation IS evoltuion, on a smaller scale than changing from one species to another. It's the stepping stone.
The extra information comes from the environment. There adaptations exist, and the environment chooses which adaptations survive. The path of least resistance or least energy waste is through the adaptations that make it easier to survive. Will you acknowledge this much? That some adaptations let a species use less energy to survive? Because understanding that is crucial to understanding that we are not going against Entropy, we're merely carrying out some of entropy's job, like everything that exists.
We have become smarter because it has been easier for us to survive and easier for us to break down energy by becoming smarter. Becomin smarter has made humans more effiecient. It's not a matter of complexity as humans see it, complexity is a human concept.
Oh, and your body adapting to a diet change and the species adapting to an environmental influence actually are two different things. I would think that as a strong evoltuionist at one point you would have know that they are two completely different uses of the word adapt. One means a genetic change, one means a solely physical change.
When you were an evoltionist, were your motives to try to fight christianity, or were they to foster the truth? Did your believeing in evolution come from not wanting to believe christianity?
|