Quote:
Originally posted by Ego Tripping
http://www.entropylaw.com/
I guess they are wrong ALSO. Too bad they are purely Scientific. (but let me guess, they are conspirators of Creationists trying to corrupt the theory of Evolution! It's just propaganda!)
|
actually, they are very right! I recommend that site to everyone.
Quote:
You'd be abslutely right...if there was only one definition.
en·tro·py ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ntr-p)
n. pl. en·tro·pies
A) Symbol S For a closed thermodynamic system, a quantitative measure of the amount of thermal energy not available to do work.
B) A measure of the disorder or randomness in a closed system. (Universe is a Closed System)
C) A measure of the loss of information in a transmitted message.
D) The tendency for all matter and energy in the universe to evolve toward a state of inert uniformity.
E) Inevitable and steady deterioration of a system or society. (But wait...Evolution is a system that doesn't seem to deteriorate...hmmmmm )
Right from the Dictionary...But wait a second...I thought it's not about order from disorder! I guess the Dictionary people must be Creationists also.[/b]
|
You consider that a scientific definition? Its only for explaining things to numbskulls.
Quote:
|
I agree. Doesn't change things though, you're only speaking about transfer of energy, not a species evolving.[/b]
|
I'm only trying to show you that your idea of the second law of thermodynamics is wrong.
Quote:
|
You're not the sharpest marble in the bag, are you? [/b]
|
Please argue with respect. Argue like you're not as desprate as you are.