Higher Thoughts A comfortable place where we can freely exchange and co-mingle our thoughts, ideas, interests, imaginations, energies, talents, and visions. This forum is for well thought out and meaningful discussion of various topics not covered in our other forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-21-2009, 10:39 AM   #1 (permalink)
Radical Dreamer
 
verklingen's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 6,923
Thanks: 431
Thanked 989 Times in 630 Posts
parallel realities: scientific credibility?

Quote:
May 21, 2009
Parallel Universes: Are They More Than a Figment of Our Imagination?

"The multiverse is no longer a model, it is a consequence of our models.”

~Aurelien Barrau, particle physicist at CERN

The Hollywood blockbuster, The Golden Compass, adapted from the first volume of Pullman's classic sci-fi trilogy, "His Dark Materials" portrays various universes as only one reality among many, but how realistic is this kind of classic sci-fi plot? While it hasn’t been proven yet, many highly respected and credible scientists are now saying there’s reason to believe that parallel dimensions could very well be more than figments of our imaginations.

"The idea of multiple universes is more than a fantastic invention—it appears naturally within several scientific theories, and deserves to be taken seriously," stated Aurelien Barrau, a French particle physicist at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN).

There are a variety of competing theories based on the idea of parallel universes, but the most basic idea is that if the universe is infinite, then everything that could possibly occur has happened, is happening, or will happen.

According to quantum mechanics, nothing at the subatomic scale can really be said to exist until it is observed. Until then, particles occupy uncertain "superposition" states, in which they can have simultaneous "up" and "down" spins, or appear to be in different places at the same time. The mere act of observing somehow appears to "nail down" a particular state of reality. Scientists don’t yet have a perfect explanation for how it occurs, but that hasn’t changed the fact that the phenomenon does occur.

Unobserved particles are described by "wave functions" representing a set of multiple "probable" states. When an observer makes a measurement, the particle then settles down into one of these multiple options, which is somewhat how the multiple universe theory can be explained.

The existence of such a parallel universe "does not even assume speculative modern physics, merely that space is infinite and rather uniformly filled with matter as indicated by recent astronomical observations," Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at MIT in Boston, Massachusetts concluded in a study of parallel universes published by Cambridge University.

Mathematician Hugh Everett published landmark paper in 1957 while still a graduate student at Princeton University. In this paper he showed how quantum theory predicts that a single classical reality will gradually split into separate, but simultaneously existing realms.

"This is simply a way of trusting strictly the fundamental equations of quantum mechanics," says Barrau. "The worlds are not spatially separated, but exist as kinds of 'parallel' universes."

Partly because the idea is so uncomfortably strange, it’s dismissed as sci-fi by many critics. But there are also many credible, respected proponents of the theory—a group that is continuously gaining new adherents as new research unveils new evidence. Some Oxford research—for the first time—recently found a mathematical answer that sweeps away one of the key objections to the controversial idea. Their research shows that Everett was indeed on the right track when he came up with his multiverse theory. The Oxford team, led by Dr David Deutsch, showed mathematically that the bush-like branching structure created by the universe splitting into parallel versions of itself can explain the probabilistic nature of quantum outcomes.

The work has another strange implication. The idea of parallel universes would apparently side-step one of the key complaints with time travel. Ever since it was given serious credibility in 1949 by the great logician Kurt Godel, many eminent physicists have argued against time travel because it undermines ideas of cause and effect. An example would be the famous “grandfather paradox” where a time traveler goes back to kill his grandfather so that he is never born in the first place.

But if parallel worlds do exist, there is a way around these troublesome paradoxes. Deutsch argues that time travel shifts happen between different branches of reality. The mathematical breakthrough bolsters his claim that quantum theory does not forbid time travel. "It does sidestep it. You go into another universe," he said. But he admits that there will be a lot of work to do before we can manipulate space-time in a way that makes “hops” possible. While it may sound fanciful, Deutsch says that scientific research is continually making the theory more believable.

"Many sci-fi authors suggested time travel paradoxes would be solved by parallel universes but in my work, that conclusion is deduced from quantum theory itself."

The borderline between physics and metaphysics is not defined by whether an entity can be observed, but whether it is testable, insists Tegmark.

He points to phenomena such as black holes, curved space, the slowing of time at high speeds, even a round Earth, which were all once rejected as scientific heresy before being proven through experimentation, even though some remain beyond the grasp of observation. It is likely, Tegmark concludes that multiverse models grounded in modern physics will eventually be empirically testable, predictive and disprovable.

Posted by Rebecca Sato
Parallel Universes: Are They More Than a Figment of Our Imagination? A Galaxy Classic

makes sense to me!

something interesting to ponder:

what causes us to experience one reality instead of another? could there be a way of controlling it?
__________________
History shows again and again how nature points up the folly of men

rip matt
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 03:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
shakeNbake06's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 383
Thanks: 13
Thanked 35 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by verklingen View Post
what causes us to experience one reality instead of another? could there be a way of controlling it?
I don't think anyone could answer that, but I've heard that we are like "tuned in" to some type of frequency (like a certain radio frequency) that our physical senses are detecting, and that there could be more of these "radio channels" all around us that we are not picking up. Who knows, maybe when we dream, we are in some sort of alternate reality. Wouldn't it be crazy if scientist one day would be able to tune into these unseen realities/universes? Definitely some trippy stuff
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 03:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Zombie!
 
farmergiles's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: K. Frimpong & His Cubano Fiestas
Posts: 2,398
Thanks: 493
Thanked 668 Times in 468 Posts
Originally Posted by verklingen View Post
what causes us to experience one reality instead of another? could there be a way of controlling it?
What`s to say we don`t experience more than one reality but our brains compress this information into one perceptible reality for the sake of clarity? Taking psychedelics or meditation or going mad may reveal alternates.

Maybe.

There are many quantum events which don`t translate into similar events in the macro world, maybe these parallel universes are so folded up that although- like imaginary numbers- understanding them has bearing on real life, they don`t exactly exist in a tangible form.
__________________
Cultivate a stoic calmness
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
User(s) Gave Thanks:
Guest (06-08-2009), Legen...dary! (05-29-2009), The Rev (06-11-2009), Xil (05-28-2009)
Old 05-28-2009, 04:06 PM   #4 (permalink)
Radical Dreamer
 
verklingen's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 6,923
Thanks: 431
Thanked 989 Times in 630 Posts
right on my friend

i believe we access a "new" reality with each decision we make. our experiences and the decisions we make due to them are like the chicken and egg. i don't know which comes first, but the decision part of the equation has a definite, quantifiable, and objectively verifiable effect on the quality of our future experiences. in this way we control both variables, riding a wave of potentiality across the multiverse.
__________________
History shows again and again how nature points up the folly of men

rip matt
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
User(s) Gave Thanks:
Legen...dary! (05-29-2009)
Old 05-29-2009, 02:40 AM   #5 (permalink)
Zombie!
 
farmergiles's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: K. Frimpong & His Cubano Fiestas
Posts: 2,398
Thanks: 493
Thanked 668 Times in 468 Posts
Hmm shall I have the strawberry milkshake or chocolate? I think chocolate.

Quantum states are set now captain!

Does the wave of potentiality travel at the speed of light or is it instantaneous?
__________________
Cultivate a stoic calmness
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 03:05 AM   #6 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Legen...dary!'s Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 119
Thanks: 71
Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts
You're taking "access" too literally. Verk means that(if I follow correctly) that there are infinite realities occurring with infinite permutations of every possible outcome of every possible decision that one would experience.

However we can only know and experience that path which we have taken.

Think of it an an infinitely wide tournament bracket... but instead of narrowing down to a final outcome... all that happens when in regards to the "win/loss" when a decision is made is that it shifts the current reality to the next, "consecutive" branch.

Or even better think of reality as a flow chart(again, infinitely wide with infinite permutations)... just because you make the "yes/no" decision on the flow chart, the other option still exists, we just don't "experience" it.

Stoned rambling, so I might not make sense, but I think I did OK.

__________________
Time is a matter of fact
when it's gone
it'll never come back
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 03:12 AM   #7 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Legen...dary!'s Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 119
Thanks: 71
Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts
Originally Posted by farmergiles View Post
What`s to say we don`t experience more than one reality but our brains compress this information into one perceptible reality for the sake of clarity? Taking psychedelics or meditation or going mad may reveal alternates.

Maybe.

There are many quantum events which don`t translate into similar events in the macro world, maybe these parallel universes are so folded up that although- like imaginary numbers- understanding them has bearing on real life, they don`t exactly exist in a tangible form.
I've always subscribed to the belief that what we see and what we perceive are both subjective and incomplete.

The existence of the hypothetical 12 additional dimensions, as stated in the M-theory backs up this too.
However we can't test to see if it's right, because we can't even begin to comprehend what the 8 other dimensions could be(superstings, magic, telekinetic abilities, no one knows) ... hell, we can hardly comprehend the 4th dimension(time) and we've known about it since the beginning of... well you know.

__________________
Time is a matter of fact
when it's gone
it'll never come back
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 12:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Legen...dary!'s Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 119
Thanks: 71
Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts
Bump
__________________
Time is a matter of fact
when it's gone
it'll never come back
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 07:17 AM   #9 (permalink)
Voice of Reason
 
Kompressor's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 321 Times in 193 Posts
Originally Posted by verklingen View Post
what causes us to experience one reality instead of another? could there be a way of controlling it?
This is what string theory also focuses on. I posted this in the Do you believe in God thread, but it also seems relevant here.

Michio Kaku: Mr Parallel Universe

Michio Kaku is playing the hottest game in town, with his new variation of string theory. By John Crace

Take a trip to a New York ice-rink at the weekend and you're likely to see a middle-aged Japanese man jumping and spinning in perfect harmony with Newtonian physics. This is Michio Kaku's idea of relaxation; no relativity, little friction - just one man and the three laws of motion. He moves almost effortlessly, his blades carving perfect patterns in the ice; but then the three-dimensional world should present few problems to a man who is equally at home in 11.

Kaku is the Henry Semat professor of theoretical physics at the City University in New York, and the man who, in the late 1960s, co-founded the field theory of strings - the equation that united a complex series of equations which described the behaviour of sub-atomic particles into a coherent whole.

Mention string theory - the notion that an electron is not a dot, but a rubber band which, if vibrated enough times, can turn into every single sub-atomic particle in the universe - to most people and you get a glazed incomprehension: but to theoretical physicists it is just about the hottest topic around. "It either explains everything, or it explains nothing," Kaku shrugs, though his expression tells you exactly which side of the fence he is on.

Over in the US you can buy a T-shirt with Kaku's equation printed on the front, but it has taken a while for him to gain this recognition. Back in 1974, he was laughed off campus when it was discovered that strings could only vibrate coherently in 10-dimensional hyperspace, and Kaku groans as he remembers being taunted by the Nobel laureate Richard Feynman with "How many dimensions are you living in today?".

Kaku started work on another theory, only to realise he was looking at the same phenomenon at a higher vibration on the rubber band. And no one is laughing any more. For years, physicists and cosmologists have been searching for the grand theory that united quantum physics and gravity theory. Einstein spent the last 30 years of his life on just this problem, trying, in his words, "to read the mind of God".

"He got to the fourth dimension and dabbled with the fifth," says Kaku, "but there wasn't yet the understanding of the nuclear force and quark model to allow him to progress. String theory is now the only real contender for the grand unified theory; everything else has fallen by the wayside. If Einstein had never lived, we would have been able to determine all his ideas from string theory."

Kaku slips into overdrive as he explains all the implications. "String theory predicts the universe is like a soap bubble that is expanding and dying," he says. Billions of years from now stars will blink out; the night sky will be dark and the oceans will freeze over. But we may have an escape route. Our soap bubble co-exists with other soap bubbles; every time a black hole forms it may be creating a baby universe. The matter being sucked in may be blown out the other side, creating a white hole in a twin universe, which will expand very rapidly, like our own Big Bang.

"Perhaps, also, a Type III civilisation, which can harness the Planck energy, will open a hole in space and tunnel through a wormhole to a parallel, warmer universe. There is no other hope. Either leave the universe or die with it. If the wormhole is microscopic in size then we may send a nanobot that can reproduce itself indefinitely and create cloning factories to recreate the dead civilisation through it."

This sounds like something out of Star Trek, but Kaku is deadly serious as he goes on to talk up his latest variation of string theory - M (membrane) theory, which operates out of 11 dimensions - and to speculate on multi-worlds theory, a new version of quantum theory, which predicts there may be clones of ourselves with separate lives. "It sounds crazy," he admits, "but we can't apologise for it as it's a possibility." He notices my eyebrow rise. "It's a theory that's being pushed strongly by physicists over here in Oxford," he adds, as if to show it's not just some nutty Stateside notion.

Kaku's voice washes easily over you. Each sentence makes sense. It's only when you get to the end of each paragraph that you realise you're hopelessly lost. But you don't really care, because it is never less than entertaining. And - academic credentials aside - this is Kaku's strong point. In the US, he's a regular contributor to the Wall Street Journal and has his own weekly radio show that explains the ins and outs of hyperspace and parallel universes.

It's a skill that was born out of necessity. "I remember being at the final congressional hearing in 1994 to decide whether the US government would fund the building of an atom smasher outside Dallas that would be twice the size of that at Cern, Geneva," he says. "A physicist was asked, 'Will we find God?'. The reply came back, 'We will find the Higgs Boson [sub-atomic particle].' That answer cost US physics the £12bn project.

"Thinking back, I would have said, 'This machine will take us as close as humanly possible to his or her greatest creation - genesis itself. It will give us a window on the instant of creation.' Before 1990, physicists only had to say 'Russia' to get their hands on cash, but since the end of the cold war, we have had to learn the language of the taxpayer."

It's a language that Kaku now speaks fluently, and the financial rewards have been forthcoming. Tempting as it is to caricature theoretical physicists as a bunch of geeks happy to operate in a mathematically pure vacuum, the reality is rather different. For the theoretical is rapidly becoming practical, as billions of dollars are now being spent to test the validity of string theory.

When Cern opens for business in two years' time, Kaku expects physicists to find evidence of sparticles - higher vibrations of the superstring, echoes from the 11th dimension. But his biggest hopes are pinned on the Laser Inferometry Space Antenna (Lisa), which will be launched in 2011. "Lisa is three satellites connected by laser beams which stretch 3m miles across space. This may pick up shock waves from the instant of creation, and maybe even pick up the umbilical cord of our universe."

Kaku's bet is that string theory will then be verified, but there's plenty happening here on earth to keep him occupied. Both string and M theory predict that gravity can seep across parallel universes - which means their existence can be proven by looking for deviations from Newton's inverse square law of gravity. One such experiment has already been conducted in Denver. "The results came back negative," he smiles, "but this just shows there are no parallel universes in Denver. Physicists in Atlanta are already planning to repeat the experiment at the atomic level."

It's hard to keep track of parallel universes, especially when Kaku keeps insisting they could be here, right now, in your living room and that there could be a universe in which Elvis Presley never died and in which Hitler was never born. But maybe Kaku's own life encourages him to believe in his own parallel world. For in most normal worlds, the first-born son of Japanese immigrants who were interned outside San Francisco during the second world war don't go on to refine and redefine Einsteinian physics.

His awakening came on hearing the news of Einstein's death when he was eight years old. "I saw this picture of his unfinished work lying on his desk," he says, "and it became like a real-life murder mystery that I wanted to solve." By the time he was 16, Kaku had bought 400lb of steel and 22 miles of copper wire and had built his very own atom smasher in the family garage. It was powerful enough to pull fillings out of teeth, but the only thing it smashed was the house. "It broke every fuse and ruined every circuit breaker," he admits ruefully.

But it had the desired effect. Kaku came to the attention of the renowned US physicist Edward Teller, who took him under his wing and secured him a scholarship to Harvard. Even then there was a parallel twist. "I discovered later that all Teller's scholarship students were earmarked for the Star Wars programme at Los Alamos," Kaku says. "I was offered a chance to work there, but I've always thought science was about creation, not destruction. So I turned it down."

Kaku's legacy remains unclear. He could go down in history as a brilliant but misguided mathematician or he could be the first person to read the mind of God. But you sense that he isn't too bothered either way. "String theory is the only game in town," he says, "and you can't afford not to play it to the end." In any case, isn't there a parallel universe in which there's a Michio Kaku who reckons string theory is a load of nonsense?

"Quite possibly," he laughs, before teleporting himself out of the room.
__________________
Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought. -H. Bergson
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 08:52 AM   #10 (permalink)
CannabisConnoisseur
 
420smokeman's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: BC
Posts: 1,560
Thanks: 115
Thanked 130 Times in 79 Posts
__________________
cause there aint nothing else to do and any where i go i know im you and i keep coming back forward through to myself
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 09:09 AM   #11 (permalink)
Radical Dreamer
 
verklingen's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 6,923
Thanks: 431
Thanked 989 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by Kompressor View Post
This is what string theory also focuses on. I posted this in the Do you believe in God thread, but it also seems relevant here.
thanks komp, much love for dr. kaku. i've been enamored since freshman year when a teacher gave me his book hyperspace. that one was a real eye-opener.
__________________
History shows again and again how nature points up the folly of men

rip matt
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.1
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design