Higher Thoughts A comfortable place where we can freely exchange and co-mingle our thoughts, ideas, interests, imaginations, energies, talents, and visions. This forum is for well thought out and meaningful discussion of various topics not covered in our other forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-2003, 12:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
Miss Yahooka 2009
 
v3d4's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Terrapin Station
Posts: 5,405
Thanks: 91
Thanked 530 Times in 318 Posts
Stanford Prison Experiment

tho i didnt add any comments i was very interested in the punishment thread and the cruelty thread, both started by our own dear Rev.
so i wanted to bring the two together and talk about the Stanford Prison Experiment.

id like everybody interested to read thru it and tell me what you think b4 i say too much on this, but i have a couple specific questions im interested in:[list][*] how does this corelate to milgrams experiment and can we learn anything from both that we cant see by looking at just one or the other?[*]is there a clear line between punishment and cruelty? how do you kno when the line is crossed?
  1. are all acts of cruelty motivated by a desire to punish?
  2. are all acts of punishment really just acts of cruelty?
  3. does it make any sense to punish cruelty (or any other "bad behavior") with cruelty?
  4. have you ever noticed if you type the word cruelty enough times it loses all meaning?[/list=a]

the prison experiment website also has a big list of discussion questions, so if anybodys inspired to answer any of those id sure like to hear what you gots to say.


and is it just me or is this guy both attractive and repulsive at the same time?
__________________
remember our Governor Ken Gorman
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2003, 04:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
Admin
 
ZenSkin's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Stanford Prison Experiment

Quote:
Originally posted by v3d4
...
id like everybody interested to read thru it and tell me what you think b4 i say too much on this, but i have a couple specific questions im interested in ...
Are we gonna get extra credit for this?



Quote:
are all acts of punishment really just acts of cruelty?
Not at all. Competent parent punish children out of love. A competent penal system would punish out of a desire to improve all of society.

I'll stick by an earlier post and say that the difference between punishment and cruelty has everything to do with the mindset of the person in change. If the 'guards' are on a power trip, cruelty follows. If the 'guards' are compassionate, punishement doesn't cross the line.

But when have you ever heard of a compassionate prison guard?

There is a book that I am too lazy to look up right now written by one of these Tibetan monks who was thrown in a Chinese jail and tortured. What does he have to say" He prayed for his guards everyday. They are not bad people though they may be stuck in the ignorance that allows violence to be perpetrated.



If you read what Gandhi, Desmond Tutu, the Dalai Lama, Martin Luther King, Aung San Suu Kyi and others devoted to peace you get the idea. It's about changing yourself to see the value of universal compassion.

Universal compassion isn't the easy road, obviously (obvious to me anyway) but it is the salvation the guards against inhumanity. If Zimbardo had recruited Buddhist monks instead of college students he would have had drastically different results. Sadly, we place no value on compassion in our society. In fact it is discouraged in the business world.
__________________
Honk if you don't exist
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2003, 10:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
~ Herban Legend ~
 
The Rev's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In my head, somewhere.
Posts: 12,343
Thanks: 223
Thanked 652 Times in 361 Posts
<u>My ramblings as I read through the experiment slide show:</u>

It's interesting to me the importance that degradation plays in prisoner indoctrination. In fact, back in the barbaric middle ages, it was common for vikings to shave the heads of conquered males as a means of subordinating them. (Kind of a peculiar parallel to today's western world where long hair is frowned upon in men. It makes you wonder if there is an underlying societal agenda to make people more subordinated; we often talk about the good of society being higher than the individual good, after all.)

****

The guards were prepared for a dangerous environment (warned) and the prisoners were degraded (making them fear their captors). I wonder if the cruelty in this experiment derived itself from the fact that everyone was afraid of everyone else. Fear engenders overreaction like no other emotion (even anger).

****

I'm intrigued by the idea of the "privilege cell." In real jails and prisons, they have a similar system called the Trustee System, where prisoners who behave themselves get clean changes of clothing more regularly, better jobs, and better treatment by the guards.

A friend of mine from the Police Academy was a Corrections Deputy in charge of the jail's trustees. He took me on a tour of the jail once (a scary experience, actually, on many levels) and I got to see how he interracted with the prisoners (and his trustees) first hand. His word for inmate was "turd." As in, "let's see what the turds are up to now." He was extremely condescending to all of them, even the trustees, and it was clear that he had no concern or respect for them.

Ironically, while he had an abrasive sense of humor outside of work, he was highly respectful of me in that environment. While he might be a first-rate smartass at the Academy, he told everyone at the jail that I was a detective and never made one smart-ass comment while we were in there.

He clearly differentiated between inmates and civilians in a non-human/human way.

****

It's chilling that they had to go to such lengths to hide the truth from the outside world (the parents). It reminds me of things I've read in an Amnesty International book on torture.

It's also scary how quickly the parents fell into all the rules surrounding their visit. In the face of authority, people seem to fall into sheeple mode so easily.

****
Re: dealing with a possible escape plot:

Then we formulated a second plan. The plan was to dismantle our jail after the visitors left, call in more guards, chain the prisoners together, put bags over their heads, and transport them to a fifth floor storage room until after the anticipated break in.

When you start having thoughts like this, shouldn't a red light go on telling you that, "Maybe this has gone too far?"

****

Prisoner #819



From what I'm reading, this woulda been me.

It's hard to imagine that real prison is just like this, but with anal rape and other forms of additional degradation from fellow inmates. It's also hard to imagine, in the face of what we know, that there are so many people demanding MORE prisons. One look at this experiment is proof enough that prisons are good for nothing.

(How could anyone, no matter how insane, honestly think that someone should be subjected to this environment (not for days, but for YEARS) for smoking weed?

****

During the parole hearings we also witnessed an unexpected metamorphosis of our prison consultant as he adopted the role of head of the Parole Board. He literally became the most hated authoritarian official imaginable, so much so that when it was over he felt sick at who he had become -- his own tormentor who had previously rejected his annual parole requests for 16 years when he was a prisoner.

This is damn interesting. A former prisoner, so indoctrinated into the prison system that he becomes someone he hated simply by being put into that role.

In a book on torture that I read, I was amazed and alarmed to discover that many torturers are victims of torture themselves. In fact, it is a common form of indoctrination for state torturers to be tortured, just like we beat up on boot camp trainees to indoctrinate them into the role of soldier.

(Who the fuck thinks this shit up, then implements it as a "good idea?")

****

It amazes me how quickly the prisoners were broken, considering it was never the systematic intention of the experiment to do this. It gives me a renewed respect for the destructive power of cruelty.

****

The incident with prisoner #416, the new guy, is illuminating. Instead of being regarded as a hero, he was shunned by the others. Never underestimate the power of fear to make a person docile.

The more I read, the more I am convinced that prisons are institutions of torture, rather than correction, regardless of the euphemistic choice of names. In torture, the idea is to kill the person's self, to break a person through pain, degradation, fear, and deprivation of hope. Torturers don't just use pain. Common tactics also include mock executions, sleep deprivation, and psychological tactics identical to those used in the experiment.

The frightening part is how easily people fall into the roles of torturer and victim, when just a few of the variables (such as a confining space, mutual fear or contempt, and means of dehumanizing are available).

****

I ended the study prematurely for two reasons. First, we had learned through videotapes that the guards were escalating their abuse of prisoners in the middle of the night when they thought no researchers were watching and the experiment was "off." Their boredom had driven them to ever more pornographic and degrading abuse of the prisoners.

I really can't think of commentary that could add to the power of this statement.

****

It's been thirty-two years since that experiment ended, and nothing has changed in the prison system, or in the attitudes that demand it's existence. Pretty fucking sorry.



The Rev

Great thread, V3d4!

BTW, have you heard of a similar experiment involving students giving electric shocks to subjects when wrong answers were given during questioning? I don't know the name of the study, but apparently, even when the voltage was upped, and the subjects "screamed and pleaded" for the abuse to stop (it was all an act, unbeknownst to the student doing the shocking), every student continued to apply the punishments, even when voltages reached "dangerous" levels. They did this all because an "authority figure" told them to do it.

If I can find a site about this study, I'll post a thread.
__________________
THE SECRET OF SUCCESS IN ALL THINGS IS A HEALTHY RELATIONSHIP WITH REALITY

DISRESPECT INCORPORATED
The Order of the Illuminati

"So we have gone from god saving Willies ass to general shit talking,
pretty much what one would expect from a YaHookan thread about religion."

-№1


R.I.P. Governor We know you're smokin wherever you are.


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2003, 02:29 PM   #4 (permalink)
.
 
4 20 an's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
i know what ur talking about reve we learned about that in school......it was interesting i forget the exact stats but the majority of them did keep applying the shock, thinking that it was real... they also did it from different distances.. they had people in the room where they coudl see the people being shocked, and then people outside of the room just being told what to do, and what was going too happen, the majority of both the people still applied the shock.. but i think like 100 % of the people in the room that they couldnt see what was going on applied the shock
__________________
god is a kid with an ant farm.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2003, 04:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Admin
 
ZenSkin's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Google search : milgram's experiment



Milgram's experiment doesn't begin in a laboratory, but rather a lecture theatre where a group of psychiatrists, university students and middle-class adults of various occupations and ages have gathered to listen to a lecture on obedience to authoity. During the lecture, Milgram asks the audience to imagine the following situation:

In response to a newspaper add offering $4.50 for one hour's work, you turn up at Yale University to take part in a Psychology experiment investigating memory and learning. You are introduced to a stern looking experimenter in a white coat and a rather pleasent and friendly co-subject. The experimenter explains that the experiment will look into the role of punishment in learning, and that one of you will be the teacher and one will be the learner. You draw lots to determine roles, and it is decided that you become the teacher. The three of you then proceed to an adjacent room, where the "learner" is strapped into a chair. The experimenter explains that this is to prevent excessive movement during the experiment, but its pretty obvious to you that the learner could not escape from the chair if he wished. Then, an electrode is attached to the learners arm, and conductive gel as applied to the electrode. The experimenter explains that this is to prevent burning and blisters. Both you and the learner are told that the electrode is attached to a electric shock generator in the other room, and that electric shocks will serve as punishment for incorrect responses. The learner asks the experimenter if "the shocks will hurt" to which the experimenter replies: "although the shocks will be painful, they cause no permanent tissue damage".

You leave the learner in his room and return to the other room where the experimenter shows you the shock generator. The generator has 30 switches, each is labelled with a voltage ranging from 15 up to 450 volts. Each switch also has a rating, ranging from "slight shock" to "danger: severe shock". The final two switches are labelled "XXX". You are told that your role is to teach the learner a simple paired associate task, but that you must punish him for incorrect responses. You are told that for every incorrect response you must increase the voltage by 15 volts (ie one more switch). The experimented gives you a 15 volt shock (enough to make you arm tingle) to check that the generator is functioning correctly. Now the experiment begins. The learner finds the task difficult and makes numerous errors. Each error results in a higher voltage shock than the previous one. To begin with the shocks are weak, but soon they become more intense. At 75 volts you can hear the learner "grunt" through the wall. The same thing happens at90 and 105 volts. At 120 volts the learner says the shocks are getting painful. You know, because you can hear him through the wall. At 150 he cries "get me out of here! I refuse to go on!".

His protests continue as the voltage gets higher and higher. If at this point, or any other point, of the experiment you question whether you should be continuing, the experimenter tells you to keep going, using such reasons as "you can't stop now", "he is getting paid to do this experiment" or that "the experiment depends on your continuing compliance". He may even say "you have no choice". As the shocks increase the learner screams out "I can't stand the pain!" At 300 volts he begins pounding on the wall and demands to be let out. After 330 volts there is no longer any noise from the learner. At this point the experimenter tells you that the learner's failure to respond should be interpreted as an incorrect response and to continue increasing the shock level. Soon either the highest shock level is reached or the learning task is completed and the experiment concludes.

__________________
Honk if you don't exist
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2003, 09:11 AM   #6 (permalink)
Can't-Get-Right
 
Sureshot's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Surrounded by the unimaginative
Posts: 6,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Heading slightly off topic...

There is a great fictional film based on this idea called "Das Experiment" directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel.

The harshness Germanic language makes the dialogue very edgy. Well worth watching and struggling through the subtitles.
Attached Images:
 
__________________
- The information in the above post is conjecture and the poster a figment of your imagination.
- All images are computer generated or were taken in nations with forward thinking laws.

o GrowFAQ o Add A Canna Grow Tip o Other Highs FAQ o Inquiring Minds FAQ o
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design