YaHooka Forums  

Go Back   YaHooka Forums > The Chronic Colloquials > Free For All
Home Register FAQ Social Groups Links Mark Forums Read

Free For All A place for thoughts and ideas that are out of place anywhere else.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-18-2008, 11:49 AM   #41 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,081
Thanks: 86
Thanked 255 Times in 183 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maturin View Post
Actually, the mods can't see any of these things. That ability was removed long ago. The admins might be able to; not sure really.

Also, lay off the personal attacks, people. This thread is getting too snarky for its own good.

Finally, I'll also say that Sofisticated is someone's alt. Not LPWY's, but someone's. In the first 18 months he/she posted a total of 4 times, and now this sudden flurry of posts in the past week, with a knowing and familiar attitude of how the place works.......dead givaway.
look at my first posts as OOTF i had a familiarity with how the place works because i used to visit the board for over a year before joining. That doesn't mean it's an alt.
LetsPlayYourWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 12:07 PM   #42 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Sofisticated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 117
Thanks: 30
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
I joined the forum a while back to ask a question about high enhancement. Over the last little bit, I started reading posts in this specific section and frankly felt I had to say something. IPs aren't the only way to tell people apart. Try matching writing syntax or tone.

I assure you, I'm no one's alt. I had a friend who introduced me to this forum, and I'm not even in contact with that guy anymore because of personal reasons. Furthermore, the suggestion that I am an 'alt' and that this somehow nullifies any of my points is ridiculous.

I will tone down the snarkiness when certain posters around here tone down their irrationality. I see nothing noble in staying silent when I feel strongly about saying something. America used to be like that, too.

Again, please attack the specific issues and ideas I raise. Attacking me because you are unwilling to accept different ideas reflects a lot more on you. Shall I strike a deal with everyone? I'll play nice and not call anyone names, but as soon as someone makes claims that I am a conspiracy theorist or that I embrace terrorism because I disagree with them, WATCH THE FUCK OUT.

So far the major issue here is that I disagree with Snownuts a lot, as well as Dubstyle. Dubs is apparently a mod. As far as I'm concerned, that IS NOT AN ISSUE. Oh, and pretty please to Dubstyle or whatever mod is involved, I would really like to be able to edit my own posts when I have to add an idea or fix a spelling error.
Sofisticated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 12:11 PM   #43 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 325
Thanks: 25
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofisticated View Post
Don't put words in my mouth, you indoctrinated moron..
hmmm... follow your own advice much?
Snownuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 12:13 PM   #44 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Sofisticated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 117
Thanks: 30
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snownuts View Post
hmmm... follow your own advice much?
You are indoctrinated. Most people here recognize that. Hate to break that to you.

I don't put words in your mouth. Your assumptions about the world are obvious because of where you stand on issues, and how you support them.

What did I say about you that wasn't true? I will retract anything I've said about you that I can't back up by quoting your posts. Let's really open up some scrutiny here. I'm an open book. Let's look back on mine and Snownuts' posts and see if we can't find some patterns.

I clearly state what I am for and what I am against. You are a snake.

EDIT: Also, can anyone in the know give me a list of Snownuts' suspected or confirmed alts?

Last edited by Sofisticated; 01-18-2008 at 12:19 PM.
Sofisticated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 12:22 PM   #45 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 325
Thanks: 25
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts
um maybe because this thread is about JOHN MCCAIN WINNING THE PRESIDENCY.,

telling me im a snake and other ad hominem attacks havent semed to dry up the support for mccain, so my question is, when will your ineffective technique change or will u be calling me a snake until 2012 and then hope someone listens along the way...?

its amazing how fast people with no point resort to personal attacks, or how people with absurd points get all angry when people look at them like their crazy as i do to u now.
Snownuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 12:33 PM   #46 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 325
Thanks: 25
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts
come on man, u gotta look at the whole conversation before you pass judgement on me. at least i would expect someone like u to terry, not many of the idiots on here who just want to slaughter me and ignore my points.

u really think ron paul is ingenuous? OR that hes consistant? or that he 'sticks to his values' - lol come on, how come all of a sudden hes the champion of the constitution this election cycle? i dont seem to have heard a peep out him ever before now, so when compared to someone like mccain who has been in the public spotlight for 40 years of course if u dont know as much about the positions he takes u can say he is more consistant.

is barack consistent or just inexperienced?
Snownuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 12:40 PM   #47 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Sofisticated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 117
Thanks: 30
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snownuts View Post
um maybe because this thread is about JOHN MCCAIN WINNING THE PRESIDENCY.,

telling me im a snake and other ad hominem attacks havent semed to dry up the support for mccain, so my question is, when will your ineffective technique change or will u be calling me a snake until 2012 and then hope someone listens along the way...?

its amazing how fast people with no point resort to personal attacks, or how people with absurd points get all angry when people look at them like their crazy as i do to u now.
Crazy, man? Crazy implies no rationality and no sense of reality. You fit that description perfectly. You defended the Bush Administration. Crazy.

When confronted with facts, you rely on insults. I rely on insults when met with poorly-constructed arguments, or when it is suggested that I would 'ruin America' by questioning the government. Essentially, I don't like unsubstantiated opinions or incoherent insults, Snowy.

ad ho·mi·nem /æd ˈhɒmənəm‑ˌnɛm, ɑd-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ad hom-uh-nuhm‑nem, ahd-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special interests rather than to one's intellect or reason.

Your candidate (though not the only one) relies on ad hominem attacks. I won't deny I don't like you man. We can keep arguing, and trust me you won't wear me out. I really want you to consider the idea that your posts are often incoherent, and that just because you have an opinion, it doesn't mean it deserves respect. I realize that people may disagree with me, so I try to back up my convictions with rational discussion and cold hard realities of what is going on in the world - not just what CNN and Fox say.

From your complete lack of disregard towards spelling, grammar, it is obvious your ideas are not well constructed.

Again, please convince me of McCain's superiority with statistics. Iraq statistics have already been discussed and they are a joke. Violence is down because of ethnic cleansing, and it's really only down to levels of a few years ago - still higher than before you started a war. Even Christian fundamentalists should realize from the Good Book that Iraq was not a just war. Furthermore, McCain's suggested policies encourage more spending, ballooning your nation's debt.

If you really want to talk about McCain, then you can't shirk away from the discussion when someone presents facts that prove you wrong.
Sofisticated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 12:43 PM   #48 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Sofisticated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 117
Thanks: 30
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snownuts View Post
come on man, u gotta look at the whole conversation before you pass judgement on me. at least i would expect someone like u to terry, not many of the idiots on here who just want to slaughter me and ignore my points.

u really think ron paul is ingenuous? OR that hes consistant? or that he 'sticks to his values' - lol come on, how come all of a sudden hes the champion of the constitution this election cycle? i dont seem to have heard a peep out him ever before now, so when compared to someone like mccain who has been in the public spotlight for 40 years of course if u dont know as much about the positions he takes u can say he is more consistant.

is barack consistent or just inexperienced?
Again, use your brain, if possible. His voting record is on file, and isn't something he fabricated. HE IS CONSISTENT. The reason you haven't really heard of him before is that he has consistently opposed ridiculous policies of administrations for the last few decades. People who do that usually aren't darlings of the Bushes and Clintons, nor would they be idolized like McCain or Hillary in your precious American media.
Sofisticated is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sofisticated For This Useful Post:
Prophet Saddam (01-18-2008)
Old 01-18-2008, 12:55 PM   #49 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 325
Thanks: 25
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts
...dude i have never seen another yahookan quote the dictionary other than OOTF,letsplayyourway ,psyopsking,sofistic ated.


you also seem to do similar things to him- aka say that "your opinion" is facts, and "your opinion" is objective. furthermore, your assertions , despire their forcefulness, do not bear any relation to the fact that mccain is beating ron paul by about 6 to 1 in the polls. other than to conclude that other people are forming their opinions based on "lies" but your opinions are apparently based on "objective facts" which u cant direct us towards,. other than posting the definition for "fact" out of the dictionary, and hurling further insults.


coincidence? maybe but if all your doing is copying his idiotry then its not worth my time to fight 2 ootfs....

ps u dont seem to see how the media is totally shitting on mccain this cycle? if anything this proves how INEFFECTIVE the media is at controlling opinions....fox news has been shoving romney down peoples throats for 2 weeks now, and NO ONE is biting. not even your average fox news viewer, which really says something about how pathetic their attempt to mold opinion in one way is.

Last edited by Snownuts; 01-18-2008 at 01:10 PM.
Snownuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 01:06 PM   #50 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 325
Thanks: 25
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry View Post
but it seems obvious to me Paul's the only person running who doesn't say things for his own political gain, but says things because he believes it. .
mccain has said twofold.

1. hes been for the surge from the very beginning, in early 2007 this caused his national poll numbers to be in the low single digits....he maintained that this was the right way to go if america had any hope of "making lemonade out of lemons". (insert other metaphor if this doesnt suit you). he now is the champion of a VINDICATED position as evidenced by the democrats no longer speaking of withdrawing all troops by such and such a date- John Edwards called them both on it- THEY BOTH (HIL AND OB) SAID THEY WOULD KEEP TROOPS THEIR TO PROTECT OUR ASSETS (our assets arent going to be gone in 5 years, ergo by their own logic, neither will all the troops...) McCain agreed with the surge to the deteriment of his poll numbers (populariy) for nearly a year before people began to conclude that his forsight (actually General Petreus' forsight, and Bush's in firing ol'Rummey) may well have snatched victory from the jaws of defeat..... how is that not speaking your mind when u know whats right even if it costs u politically?

2. he was against many of the far -right wing things, (immigration reform, campaign finance lack of reform, etc) this is at a time when the gop controlled both houses and hawkish neo conservatives ran the show- Mccain took a line AGAINST those people, and again, took political flack for it....and if he doesnt win now, it will be because he took so much flack from the hard right wing that they shot themselves in the foot.....

3. Mccain is the oldest candidate, he obviously is the only one to have been in combat, the only one (of any president in history) to have been a PRISONER OF WAR for 7 YEARS.....the only one with any claim that this win is for something other than his/her big fucking ego...


..... so there is some substance for ya terry (hopefully ootfs alt will respond to substance as well but i doubt it).... do u really think mccain has said what is politically convenient in the past? I think hes the most selfless candidate by objective measures (1-3 above) of any candidate and id challenge someone to show me otherwise with as much substance as ive shown here...

Last edited by Snownuts; 01-18-2008 at 01:12 PM.
Snownuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 01:19 PM   #51 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Sofisticated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 117
Thanks: 30
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snownuts View Post
mccain has said twofold.

1. hes been for the surge from the very beginning, in early 2007 this caused his national poll numbers to be in the low single digits....he maintained that this was the right way to go if america had any hope of "making lemonade out of lemons". (insert other metaphor if this doesnt suit you). he now is the champion of a VINDICATED position as evidenced by the democrats no longer speaking of withdrawing all troops by such and such a date- John Edwards called them both on it- THEY BOTH (HIL AND OB) SAID THEY WOULD KEEP TROOPS THEIR TO PROTECT OUR ASSETS (our assets arent going to gone in 5 years, ergo by their own logic, neither will all the troops...) McCain agreed with the surge to the deteriment of his poll numbers (populariy) for nearly a year before people began to conclude that his forsight may well have snatched victory from the jaws of defeat..... how is that not speaking your mind when u know whats right even if it costs u politically?

2. he was against many of the far -right wing things, (immigration reform, campaign finance lack of reform, etc) this is at a time when the gop controlled both houses and hawkish neo conservatives ran the show- Mccain took a line AGAINST those people, and again, took political flack for it....and if he doesnt win now, it will be because he took so much flack from the hard right wing that they shot themselves in the foot.....

3. Mccain is the oldest candidate, he obviously is the only one to have been in combat, the only one (of any president in history) to have been a PRISONER OF WAR for 7 YEARS.....the only one with any claim that this win is for something other than his/her big fucking ego...


..... so there is some substance for ya terry (hopefully ootfs alt will respond to substance as well but i doubt it).... do u really think mccain has said what is politically convenient in the past? I think hes the most selfless candidate by objective measures (1-3 above) of any candidate and id challenge someone to show me otherwise with as much substance as ive shown here...
Hey bud. McCain being FOR THE SURGE ALL ALONG IS A REASON HE SHOULDN'T BE PRESIDENT. I respect that he held out as a POW for 7 years. However, if this meant anything then the military would by and large be supporting him. They are not supporting him. In fact, Ron Paul has the most military backing financially.

Just being against "some right-wing" is anything substantive. He's not against the RIGHT things, which are actually hurting your country in a big way. (IRAQ, BIG GOVERNMENT SPENDING, THE WAR ON DRUGS, THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION)

There. Responded with substance. Again, you disregard the facts that Iraq has caused more violence. You, my good man are the one who rarely responds with substance.

Furthermore, you can't use the terms "sunk cost" and "ad hominem" without contradicting yourself. This necessitates a peek at the old dictionary. Apparently, this makes you uncomfortable as someone who doesn't like captilization of proper nouns or apostrophes in general.

Furthermore, if you would look up the words "syntax" and "tone" as I suggested, you may be able to differentiate myself and some others.

Again, you've said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING OF SUBSTANCE. AGAIN YOU HAVE JUST IGNORED INDISPUTABLE FACTS AND REAL DEFINITIONS OF WORDS IN ORDER TO KEEP THINKING YOU ARE RIGHT.

However, you keep posting. I told you man. I'm just as persistent as you, the only difference is I think things out. I know it's scary to take a look at oneself.
Sofisticated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 01:24 PM   #52 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 325
Thanks: 25
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts
Furthermore, if you would look up the words "syntax" and "tone" as I suggested, you may be able to differentiate myself and some others.

=
clearly, but u go back and forth.... sometimes ur pretty intelligent souding, others it seems like ur trying to emulate that professor of lizard aliens at the univ. of toronto letsplayyourway
Snownuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 01:33 PM   #53 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Sofisticated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 117
Thanks: 30
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snownuts View Post
Furthermore, if you would look up the words "syntax" and "tone" as I suggested, you may be able to differentiate myself and some others.

=
clearly, but u go back and forth.... sometimes ur pretty intelligent souding, others it seems like ur trying to emulate that professor of lizard aliens at the univ. of toronto letsplayyourway
That is an innately human characteristic, no? Sometimes cool and rational, yet incited to hotness by issues that one feels strongly about. However, I always try to present something rational. Really, if anything my swearing builds on my frustration that no one looks at the issues without prejudice.

Yet again, I make no apologies about my sometimes scathing tone or strong words. Words are all we have on here, anyway.
Sofisticated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 02:49 PM   #54 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,081
Thanks: 86
Thanked 255 Times in 183 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snownuts View Post
...dude i have never seen another yahookan quote the dictionary other than OOTF,letsplayyourway ,psyopsking,sofistic ated.


you also seem to do similar things to him- aka say that "your opinion" is facts, and "your opinion" is objective. furthermore, your assertions , despire their forcefulness, do not bear any relation to the fact that mccain is beating ron paul by about 6 to 1 in the polls. other than to conclude that other people are forming their opinions based on "lies" but your opinions are apparently based on "objective facts" which u cant direct us towards,. other than posting the definition for "fact" out of the dictionary, and hurling further insults.


coincidence? maybe but if all your doing is copying his idiotry then its not worth my time to fight 2 ootfs....

ps u dont seem to see how the media is totally shitting on mccain this cycle? if anything this proves how INEFFECTIVE the media is at controlling opinions....fox news has been shoving romney down peoples throats for 2 weeks now, and NO ONE is biting. not even your average fox news viewer, which really says something about how pathetic their attempt to mold opinion in one way is.
A) You are blind if you have not seen other people had to point out the definitions of words to you.

B) You are blind if you think Sofisticated is my alt as its 2 totally different writing styles. The mere fact that he tries to get you to accept the FACTS of REALITY(something you hide from) only makes him a realist not an alt.

C) You are blind if you think the media is backing Romney.

Last edited by LetsPlayYourWay; 01-18-2008 at 06:00 PM.
LetsPlayYourWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 03:53 PM   #55 (permalink)
Old School
 
DubStyle311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: down the highway
Posts: 7,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 65 Posts
Sofisticated is noones alt. His writing style is indeed different from OOTF and his Ron Paul zealotry doesnt match any other posters as far as I can tell.
__________________
I may be wrong, but I doubt it.
DubStyle311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 07:10 PM   #56 (permalink)
Moldavite Plus
 
SquirrelDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 558
Thanks: 112
Thanked 34 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snownuts View Post
3. Mccain is the oldest candidate, he obviously is the only one to have been in combat, the only one (of any president in history) to have been a PRISONER OF WAR for 7 YEARS.....the only one with any claim that this win is for something other than his/her big fucking ego...
First of all, Ron Paul is older than McCain, get your facts straight. Second, in regards to military service:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Military service and medical career

Paul considered becoming a Lutheran minister like two of his brothers[11] (Jerrold has a doctorate in counseling and attended Princeton Seminary; David pastors Trinity Lutheran Church in Grand Rapids, Michigan).[8][14] Instead he decided to pursue a medical doctorate at Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, North Carolina, attaining it in 1961. He interned and began residency training, both in internal medicine, at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit (1961–1962);[27] Carol meanwhile ran a dance school in their basement and raised collies.[9]

The medical training was soon interrupted when he received a draft notice and entered the U.S. Air Force during the Cuban Missile Crisis.[28] He remained in the military during the early years of the Vietnam War.[29] He served active duty as a flight surgeon from 1963 to 1965, attending to the ear, nose, and throat problems of pilots in South Korea, Iran, Ethiopia, and Turkey, but was never sent to Vietnam. Based out of Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio, Paul achieved the rank of captain[10][30] and obtained his private pilot's license.[16] The experience of performing physicals on helicopter pilot candidates, at a time when he saw many copters being shot down, deeply affected Paul; he later considered his indirect association with the Vietnam War as a catalyst for his rejection of interventionist foreign policy.[31]

Paul received a higher wage from the Air Force than during his initial residency, $700 per month;[32] he joked that he was "fantastically rich."[16] While in San Antonio, Paul also moonlighted three nights a week in a local church hospital's emergency room for $3 per hour, and became involved with Barry Goldwater's 1964 presidential campaign.[14] He then served in the Air National Guard while completing his residency (1965–1968), having switched to ob/gyn at the University of Pittsburgh.[33] His residency research into causes of pregnancy toxemia was subsequently published in the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology. He moved to Surfside Beach, Texas, on July 3, 1968, and eventually delivered more than 4,000 babies.[34]

Assuming the practice of a retiring doctor in Lake Jackson, Texas, in a single day, Paul became the only ob/gyn doctor in Brazoria County,[16] reportedly delivering 40–50 babies a month and frequently busy with surgery.[35] His practice refused Medicare and Medicaid payments; he worked pro bono, arranged discounted or custom-payment plans for needy patients,[23] or otherwise "just took care of them."[36]
Ron Paul - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Last edited by SquirrelDog; 01-18-2008 at 07:10 PM. Reason: Added link
SquirrelDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 09:21 PM   #57 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 325
Thanks: 25
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts
wow i had no idea ron paul was 73- i will say the man looks great for his age.

but that about all i will say about him.
Snownuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 11:10 PM   #58 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,081
Thanks: 86
Thanked 255 Times in 183 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snownuts View Post
wow i had no idea ron paul was 73- i will say the man looks great for his age.

but that about all i will say about him.
Finally doing something good, having noting nice or true to say so not saying anything at all. Good job.
LetsPlayYourWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 02:00 AM   #59 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Sofisticated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 117
Thanks: 30
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubStyle311 View Post
Sofisticated is noones alt. His writing style is indeed different from OOTF and his Ron Paul zealotry doesnt match any other posters as far as I can tell.
Can we agree that me being called a zealot is name calling? Dubstyle clearly says it to defame my character and in the hope of making my arguments null. I'll take the high road. Read my responses to your "Ron Paul is Indeed Wrong Thread". Am I really a zealot? Am I uncompromising? Not at all, but you have clearly run out of ways to attack me. You came at me with some legitimate issues you believed in, and I rebutted. Is there a particular reason that you stopped posting in that thread after I rebutted? Ran out of things to say?

In the "Ron Paul is indeed wrong thread", I even gave you some concessions.

I'm getting sick of defending myself against people who don't understand the definition of the words they use. FYI, your credibility as a mod is going down when you must resort to calling me a zealot.

And, again, as far as national debt goes I would like you to discuss how candidates other than Ron Paul plan to approach eliminating some of the debt. Simple task. Get to it.
Sofisticated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 02:43 PM   #60 (permalink)
Old School
 
DubStyle311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: down the highway
Posts: 7,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 65 Posts
zeal (zēl) pronunciation
n.

Enthusiastic devotion to a cause, ideal, or goal and tireless diligence in its furtherance. See synonyms at passion.

Sounds about right to me, no? You're the one taking it as a pejorative. It was never meant to be. I think it aptly describes Ron Paul followers. Theyre a different breed.
__________________
I may be wrong, but I doubt it.
DubStyle311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design