Toker00

Message #38616 posted by cryote (Info) October 13, 2001 04:46:48 ET


A few pieces of the unsolved puzzle of the Tragedy on 9-11-2001 ('Global
Hawk' remote flight control technology + CIA/Mossad
foreknowledge/forewarning + insider trading + elder bush doing business
with bin Laden) = sufficiently suspect coincidences which warrant a Full
Congressional Investigation into wrong-doing which may lead to
Impeachment of the Bush administration.
Those unwilling to learn from past events are doomed to relive identical
events. The US is reliving Bush's Iraqi human slaughter for Oil! war of
1990 all over again as the 'war on terrorism' is based on past failures
like the 'war on drugs' or the war in Korea or the war in Vietnam. Why -
it's Impeachment time from the Nixonian era all over again!
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0110/S00021.htm
Scoop: Michael Rowbotham: Written In Belief

Given the CIA had foreknowledge, Congress must act on behalf the
public's right to investigate why no preventative actions were taken.

This is an URGENT CALL for Immediate CONGRESSIONAL Investigation into
the competency of the US Executive Branch with respect to the tragedy of
September 11, 2001.

If Congress refuses to open the appropriate Inquiries then the US People
have every right to convene and hold a new Constitutional Convention to
form a Congress which does represent the US people.

----
CONTACT your ELECTED OFFICIALS: local - state - federal - to add your
voice to call for an Congressional Investigation of the September 11,
2001 tragedy now!

CONGRESSIONAL E-MAIL ADDRESSES AND WEB SITES http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/congress/conemail.txt
ASCII
----

US foreign policy amounts nothing more than a armed protection service
for US corporations abroad to enjoy unbridled use of foreign assets and
populations for private US corporate growth. Individual US citizens (or
even citizens of nations where US corporations are active) are not
considered in the equation as vital US interests. Only natural resources
(especially fossil fuels which have created a runaway climate
temperature increases which promise to wreck our economic and financial
future) and the access to a world-wide cheap labor pool and the private
corporate model are considered 'vital US interests'.

So the expenditure of 5000 US human lives by those responsible must in
turn be held accountable against the actions of US foreign policy. The
perpetrators motive must be analyzed in the big picture of who has more
to gain. Will the unlimited military retaliation which excuses
unacceptable loss of civilian life (as the sinister phrase 'collateral
damage' denotes) result in the US gaining secure access to foreign
natural resource assets (oil). The greed obsession to maintain the
oil-based economy is a Crime against Humanity.

Many alternative sources of energy are available today (or with
continued development) to phase out the planet destroying oil-based
economy which only benefits families such as the Bushes and Cheneys to
build personal wealth dynasties at the Government trough.

Had not one million Iraq civilians, women and children been starved by
the leftover dictator of a failed US mission, had not the Palestinian
people been forcibly removed from their country by Israeli settlers
relying on unlimited US foreign assistance, had not Saudi Arabia been
transformed into a US subsidiary and had not world-wide poverty gone
unchecked, no one would listen to and act on behalf of the extremist
fanaticism of religious zealots like bin Laden.

To the present US unelected Executive regime: It's the foreign policy,
stupid!

Do not believe that the enemy of your enemy can be your friend as the
present house of cards foreign policy is based upon.

---
Evidence of CIA/US State Department foreknowledge/forewarning
---
U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies received warning signals at least
three months ago that Middle Eastern terrorists were planning to hijack
commercial aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols of
American and Israeli culture, according to a story in Germany's daily
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ).

From: http://www.bizreport.com/article.php...2137&width=800
Echelon Gave Authorities Warning Of Attacks
--
The United States is expecting a terrorist attack orchestrated by the
Saudi extremist Osama bin Laden soon,..... "In the past such individuals
have not distinguished between official and civilian targets," the State
Department said.

From: http://www.smh.com.au/news/0107/20/world/world6.html
US alert: coded message reveals bin Laden terror plot

----
Powell and Bush (showing conflict of interest) summarily excused the CIA
from culpability.
--- http://www.nandotimes.com/nation/sto...-1289248c.html
The Nando Times: ANALYSIS: Attacks might have been detected
---

Prescott Bush, grandfather of Bush the present White House resident had
business dealings with Hitler's nazis and his company's assets were
frozen. The Bush family business connections with German nazism by
itself is high treason.
http://indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=69808
more bush family history

Bush the Elder, father of Bush the present White House resident, had
business dealings with bin Laden until August 2001 and said Carlyle
company's assets should be frozen.
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/chan...m?ChannelID=39
Conspiracy Planet - Bush Crime Family - Bush Family Terrorism
http://sandiego.indymedia.org/displa...ticle_id=11147
Bush, Bath and Bin Laden, by J.H. Hatfield
http://indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=72118
More Bush Financial Ties to bin Laden

Why did the US Executive Branch of Government not stop or prevent the
tragedy and decide to take no action with the CIA's foreknowledge of the
plot specifics?

Is the US Executive Branch of Government criminally negligent or
treasonous by doing nothing to stop or prevent the tragedy?

Bush the Elder (being an ex-CIA Director, ex-US President and father of
the present White House Bush resident) was considered by the CIA and the
current occupant of the White House to be above the law; immune from any
conflict of interest, immune from committing treasonous acts by having
business dealings with a known enemy of the US.
http://www.americanfreedomnews.com/a...ushsecrets.htm
Bush family’s dirty little secret

Since Bush the Elder did business with bin Laden, a known enemy of the
US, Bush the Elder must be investigated for committing treasonous acts
against the people of the US. Since Bush the Elder commands a huge and
continuous impact of our President Select Junior, we need to ask Select
Junior what he knew and when he knew it.

Impeachment of our President Select Junior Bush may result based on High
Treason and Crimes against Humanity. Bush the Elder and Junior Bush
frequently exchange written correspondence between each other.
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen.htm
BUSHLADEN

Insider trading of stocks of companies two weeks prior to the Tragedy
require the scrutiny of investigation. Word may have been passed from
the CIA (which possessed foreknowledge of the tragedy) and or Bush the
Elder to the stock traders. Evidence of these misdeeds also constitute
treasonous acts against the US.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oc...bond-o05.shtml
Suspicious trading points to advance knowledge by big investors
http://www.copvcia.com/stories/oct_2001/krongard.html
SUPPRESED DETAILS OF CRIMINAL INSIDER TRADING LEAD DIRECTLY INTO THE
CIA’s HIGHEST RANKS - CIA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR “BUZZY” KRONGARD MANAGED
FIRM THAT HANDLED “PUT” OPTIONS ON UAL

Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and
prosecutes government corruption and abuse, reacted with disbelief to
The Wall Street Journal report of yesterday that George H.W. Bush, the
father of President Bush, works for the bin Laden family business in
Saudi Arabia through the Carlyle Group, an international consulting firm
and that senior Bush had met with the bin Laden family at least twice.
http://aztlan.net/judwatch.htm
Bush Sr. in business with bin Laden

The Wall Street Journal reported on or about September 27, 2001 (buried
in a few pages) that the Elder Bush (associated with the Carlyle group)
HAD business meetings with the Bin Laden partners in Saudi Arabia as
recent as August 2001 and INCLUDED former Secretary of State James A.
Baker and other top Republicans. The treasonous involvement by members
of Congress explains why every member of Congress (except Rep. Barbara
Lee of California) fell into goose-step behind Bush giving him a false
authority of carte blanche dimensions to wreck havoc, death and
destruction in all countries who harbor terrorists.
http://indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=71802
Say what you want, but this war is illegal
http://interactive.wsj.com/fr/emailt...8608890000.djm
WSJ-bin Laden Family Could Profit From Jump In Defense Spending
http://news.indiatimes.com/articlesh..._id=1197180992
Probe links WTC, Kandahar hijacks

FEMA and Cheney are implicated by the facts that Cheney was appointed on
May 9, 2001 to lead the US government's anti-terrorism plan with a FEMA
team. Reports show that US intelligence ignored warnings of planned
terrorist attacks.
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=68624
FEMA culpable - Cheney should resign

---
Teases of Evidence of Israeli-Mossad Secret Service foreknowledge and
involvement
--- http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pa...ID=0&listSrc=Y
Ha'aretz-Odigo says workers were warned of attack
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pa...6&contrassID=2
5 Israelis detained for `puzzling behavior' after WTC tragedy
http://anon.free.anonymizer.com/http...ticle_id=70594
Mossad
---

What's your definition of Treason? Violation of the Public Trust?
Willful and Intentional actions (or inactions) which do harm to the US
People? Criminal Misuse of Public Funds? Given numerous warnings over
the past six months, the $340 billion US War Department and $40 billion
CIA had it well within their powers to heighten airline and airport and
border security to stop or hamper the tragic events on September 11,
2001.

In the fury of Bush's crusade-jihad, is the US public expected to meekly
allow US Constitutional rights to be permanently erased while
never-ending reprisals are executed against the US people by thousands
or millions of bin Laden-inspired sympathizers?

By lending a false legitimizing influence to transforming the US
government into an Orwellian state in both domestic and foreign policy,
the Bush government rises to the level of the Taliban. Bush had never
considered anything but a military response and had planned to topple
the Taliban prior to the tragedy of September 11, 2001.

In answering terror with more terror, Bush only fans the flames of
terror and ignores the underlying causes of the tragedy - namely a
foreign policy (which meddles in the affairs of other nations) abhorrent
to (and warned against by) the Founders of the US Republic.

Bush 'war on terrorism' destabilizes nations and does not address the
root causes of terrorism: poverty and unwieldy, unaccountable US foreign
intervention of favoritism and sanctions.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Ar...266289,00.html
The algebra of infinite justice
---
On October 2, 2001 around 50,000 people took part in a protest organized
by the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI) party in Quetta, shouting
anti-American slogans and condemning Musharraf for backing the US. The
Taliban regime in Afghanistan and its supporters in Pakistan have warned
Musharraf that he faces a civil war if his administration supports the
US military action.

From: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/pak-o05.shtml
A combustible political situation in Pakistan

---
In addressing terror by suspending our hard-fought US Constitutional
rights, Bush only seeks to blatantly squash dissent, protection of the
environment, right to assemble to redress grievances, freedom of the
press and freedom of expression in order to proceed unfettered toward
gas and oil development of the oil-rich Caspian Sea on behalf of UNOCAL
by means of using the September 11, 2001 tragedy as a pretense and US
military retaliation as a corporate proxy mercenary force.
http://anon.free.anonymizer.com/http...ticle_id=72598
The U.S. in the Caspian: The Divergence of Political and Commercial Interests
http://www.atimes.com/global-econ/CJ06Dj01.html
Asia Times: The oil behind Bush and Son's campaigns
http://www.house.gov/international_r...wsap212982.htm
Statement by John J. Maresca, Vice President, Unocal Corporation

Take your pick:

Bush-Fawell's fundamentalism is pitted against bin Laden's
fundamentalism. That's a Hobson's choice. There's no difference in the
extremist positions of either side.
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pa...0&contrassID=1
Ha'aret-U.S. nuclear weapons sent to Afghanistan as 'last resort'

Very Fast war? A likely Pakistani civil war which could see Pakistani
nuclear devices fall into terrorist hands. If terrorists (or the US)
detonate small tactical nuclear devices, China and Russia will be drawn
into the mix, stepping up to massive nuclear unleashing. According to
mid-east news feeds, China has mobilized several thousand PLA troops on
the Afghani-Sino border to stop any refugees from entering China.

Fast War? 'Taking out' city by city in a nuclear tit for tat exchange.
Unaccounted for suitcase-sized nuclear devices are presumed to be in
terrorist hands. Russia (from the days of the breakup of the Soviet
Union) is missing a number of nuclear devices.

A number of Wars? Afghani, Iraqi, Sudanese, Palestinian, Jewish, Balkan,
South Asian, Central and South American and US causalities in the
millions over 20 years. US foreign policy acts are responsible for
two-thirds of the planet's 23 million war deaths over the past 50 years.
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO110A.html
Centre for Research on Globalisation -- "OSAMAGATE"

No War? This is the only answer for the future of Humanity. Massive
Pro-Democracy movements around the world including in the US with free
and fair elections where the election winner gets the expected and
deserved privilege of sitting in the office. In this way, the winner
would be responsible to the will of the People to pursue Life, Liberty,
and Happiness.

---

In line with the fact that 50 million US voters who elected Al Gore as
US President in 2000 with a 500,000 plus majority including a majority
of Florida voters, an international Gallup poll from September 21, 2001
registered 46% of US people were opposed to military action or in the
undecided category.

Polling revealed that people in 32 of 35 of the world's countries are
opposed to military attack - in favor of extradition to stand trial.
Israel, India and the US are the exceptions. Anti-war sentiments are at
80-90% in Europe and Latin America. People have expressed misgivings for
a military solutions at home and abroad.

Bush holds no public mandate for the office of President which he
occupies. Bush was not elected rather appointed by five members of the
US Supreme Court. The National Lawyers Guild is gathering support on the
Senate Judiciary Committee and public sentiment to impeach the felonious
five Supreme Court members. Treason was committed by the five Court
occupants which disallowed a full and fair vote count.
http://www.nlg.org/impeachment/
NLG Impeachment Committee Research
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i...205&s=bugliosi
None Dare Call It Treason

Beyond adding embassy security 50 days prior to the tragedy, the US
State Department's terrorist alert was ignored by the US Executive
branch of Government. Congressional Investigations would be able to
conclude whether or not:

1) US intelligence used the foreknowledge to hatch a CIA-inspired plot
within the plot of the foreign nationals in order to justify toppling
the Taleban and massive military retaliation against all terrorists
including domestic and foreign political opposition and dissent. The
CIA-inspired plot could have easily employed and had planted on the
aircraft remote control technology used on 'Global Hawk' or VDAM
GPS-guided missiles; or

--- http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/n...lvalentine.htm
Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS
http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/n...s_home_run.htm
"Home Run" Electronically Hijacking the World Trade Center Attack
Aircraft
http://geocities.com/mknemesis/homerun.html
http://software.design.tripod.com/mirror/homerun.htm
http://indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=70700
Did the terrorists do it? Duh.
---

2) The terrorists may not have been physically on the aircraft.
First-hand observation of the flight's missile-like precision (with
which all four of 'hijacked' aircraft displayed) indicates the use of
'global hawk' ground-based remote flight control technology. In this
scenario, the terrorists (who controlled the aircraft from the ground)
may not be those identified by the FBI as the hijackers. Elements within
Mossad, CIA and other extremists may have acted in concert.

3) US intelligence with foreknowledge did nothing and in effect -
criminally and treasonously sanctioned the actions on September 11,
2001; or

3) US intelligence with foreknowledge did nothing since there were too
many just as urgent plots which the CIA was monitoring - which would
show gross criminal negligence; or

4) the US Executive Branch of government is guilty or innocent of any
other charges.
---
www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/congress/conem...

Peace. Realize, then Legalize.

roll1

we who have been paying attention to such things know that the CIA knew something was up. They did not share there info. They did they did not know exactly what was going to go down.
Bush and Cheney are oil mongers and need to be watched closely or they will rape Alaska even more. I do not believe it is in the best intrests of BIG OIL to stir things up in the Middle East. The price of oil and gas is down now if you haven't noticed. Mostly because airplanes aren't flying as much. We now have a glut of oil which should keep prices down all winter. Not good for BIG OIL.


[This message has been edited by roll1 (edited October 13, 2001).]

jackie420

Why do people always post shitty articles. hehheh i mean if your gonna post something at least post an article with all facts and not just a bunch of nonsense.

Toker00

Care to PROVE that it is all nonsense, jackie420? How about posting your FACTS that disprove ANY of this. Go ahead. Post.

Peace. Realize, then Legalize.

[This message has been edited by Toker00 (edited October 13, 2001).]

Makros_01

i don't dispute the validity of the arguement.. i don't care enough. But this comment above me here disturbs me more.. Proove it's not true?? HOW FUCKED IN THE HEAD ARE YOU. Innocent until PROOVEN guilty, you wanker

__________________
sometimes i'm drunk.

Toker00

Yeah, Makros_01. Tell that to Tom and Rollie. That's the way it used to be, not now. Tell that to all the people who have had their property confiscated by the DEA who aren't even CHARGED with a crime. Innocent until proven guilty? HA!! Not in this country, you wanker.

Peace. Realize, then Legalize.

misspipepuffer

The thing that really pisses me off about the whole thing, is how quickly these suspected thugs were rounded up after 9/11. We have become too complacent