YaHooka Forums  

Go Back   YaHooka Forums > The Chronic Colloquials > Higher Thoughts
Home Register FAQ Social Groups Links Mark Forums Read

Higher Thoughts A comfortable place where we can freely exchange and co-mingle our thoughts, ideas, interests, imaginations, energies, talents, and visions. This forum is for well thought out and meaningful discussion of various topics not covered in our other forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-20-2004, 06:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeta-burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Out there
Posts: 517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New theory of the universe

I have formulated a theory of the universe. it is in total agreeance with quantum mechanics general relativity string theory and supergravity. in basic it states that our universe, so to speak, is 3 different 'plates' that are our space in 3 different time zones, all linked by wormholes, and it is twisted in 11D. its hard to grasp at first, but once you understand it it relatively simple. when i can im gonna get a web page up about it. i have a notebook where i have written down all the pics and explanations behind it. What i like about it is that it can link science and spirituality as well as explain many to date 'unexplained phenomena', without introducing any insane concepts or ridiculously far fetched ideas. For now im not gonna say too much else about this theory till i can get a page up about it. i dont want my material to fall into the wrong hands alrite peace out for now. i gots lotta work 2 do :P
Zeta-burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 06:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
no custom. customize
 
snapshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The unOriginal Rorschach.
Posts: 19,305
Thanks: 15
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
in basic it states that our universe, so to speak, is 3 different 'plates' that are our space in 3 different time zones, all linked by wormholes, and it is twisted in 11D. its hard to grasp at first, but once you understand it it relatively simple.
Wow, you should write a book. You make it so simple.

__________________
We are all atheists about most of the gods that society has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
-Richard Dawkins
snapshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 07:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
Are you in?
 
Ego Tripping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,461
Thanks: 229
Thanked 657 Times in 438 Posts
Personally, I think any attempt to explain the workings of this Infinite force is futile, you're always going to arrive at smaller, more segregated wholes, not actually 'parts' that can make the mechanics of something as great as the Universe. Size is trivial and all matter is a function of another. Everything is 1 and any laws trying to explain 1 would be impossible to convey with words or theory.
__________________

God appears, and God is light,
To those poor souls who dwell in night;
But does a human form display
To those who dwell in realms of day.

Ego Tripping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 10:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Semper Fi
 
DrugsBunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
did anyone else ever wonder what would happen if you would just keep going deeper into space? after you pass up all of the other galaxies, where would you go?
__________________
Future Devil Dog
Headed Off to Paris Island in 2009
DrugsBunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 10:17 PM   #5 (permalink)
no custom. customize
 
snapshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The unOriginal Rorschach.
Posts: 19,305
Thanks: 15
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Weed4life
did anyone else ever wonder what would happen if you would just keep going deeper into space? after you pass up all of the other galaxies, where would you go?
I dunno where I would go I sure as hell would need a spliff.
__________________
We are all atheists about most of the gods that society has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
-Richard Dawkins
snapshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 12:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeta-burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Out there
Posts: 517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i was actually thinking about writing a book. but id rather make a web page :P
Zeta-burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 03:13 AM   #7 (permalink)
Ribbed for her pleasure!
 
Hedons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago Burbs. Delta(x) times Delta(p) is greater than or equal to h-bar over two.
Posts: 4,645
Thanks: 23
Thanked 189 Times in 101 Posts
Interesting idea!

What are the major differences between your hypothesis and theEkpyrotic Universe theory?

-Hedons
__________________
New and improved! Now with flushable applicator.
Hedons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 04:40 AM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeta-burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Out there
Posts: 517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
that theory has only 2 plates. that theory is also not new, it spawned outta the string theory. it is similiar to mine, but the differences are drastic. my universe has 5 dimensions, but due to the way our plate is linked to the other 2, it would appear theres 11. im workin on gettin a web page put up to explain in full detail. my universe also works with mergin with paralell universes, time travel(not the kind youre used to) and all other sorts of cool stuff, like why you have deja vu, and esp... and yes, we can never have a theory that explains all the stuff about our universe. check up on your quantum mechanics. we cant know everything. its impossible... there are limits to our knowledge.
Zeta-burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 02:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Old School
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ego Tripping
Personally, I think any attempt to explain the workings of this Infinite force is futile, you're always going to arrive at smaller, more segregated wholes, not actually 'parts' that can make the mechanics of something as great as the Universe. Size is trivial and all matter is a function of another. Everything is 1 and any laws trying to explain 1 would be impossible to convey with words or theory.

So what do you suggest? That we all stare at our navels and chant Ommm?

To whoever asked about flying past the galaxies: We don't really know, but spacetime is curved, and some physicists believe it curves back on itself, so you may arrive back where you started. If the universe is curved like a mobius strip, you could arrive back here, but you would be reversed!
__________________
Nihilists, huh? Fuck me.
I mean, say what you want about the tenents of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos!
HunterThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 09:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
fledgling robot slave
 
sherlockholmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: 30* N 90* W
Posts: 346
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ego Tripping
Personally, I think any attempt to explain the workings of this Infinite force is futile, you're always going to arrive at smaller, more segregated wholes, not actually 'parts' that can make the mechanics of something as great as the Universe. Size is trivial and all matter is a function of another. Everything is 1 and any laws trying to explain 1 would be impossible to convey with words or theory.
The problem here is that you assume the universe is an infinite force, and there simply is no evidence to suggest that it is. I mean, it is really, really, really, really, really big, and we don't really understand it at all, but we must try. If we don't try to explain the universe, our current understanding will never get any better, and if we all give up we leave nothing behind when we die.
__________________
ellis. d
Quote:
i'm right goddamnit.
let me babble, fuckers.
sherlockholmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 09:18 PM   #11 (permalink)
Are you in?
 
Ego Tripping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,461
Thanks: 229
Thanked 657 Times in 438 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterThompson
So what do you suggest? That we all stare at our navels and chant Ommm?
Now that you mention it...I think I've learned more just through meditation and contemplation than what I've actually read. Experience is a much better teacher than a textbook or mathematical formula.

Quote:
To whoever asked about flying past the galaxies: We don't really know, but spacetime is curved, and some physicists believe it curves back on itself, so you may arrive back where you started. If the universe is curved like a mobius strip, you could arrive back here, but you would be reversed!
Isn't that the essence of Infinity? Always leaving, always coming back, hence, neverending.
__________________

God appears, and God is light,
To those poor souls who dwell in night;
But does a human form display
To those who dwell in realms of day.

Ego Tripping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 09:24 PM   #12 (permalink)
Are you in?
 
Ego Tripping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,461
Thanks: 229
Thanked 657 Times in 438 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sherlockholmes
The problem here is that you assume the universe is an infinite force, and there simply is no evidence to suggest that it is.
Granted, but more suggesting is it than it isn't. We can't even find the smallest constituent of any particle of matter. We don't even fully know what matter IS. We haven't the slightest clue at what light is and it's the most abundant force in existance (and in some views, the only, everything else is just a side-product of Light).

Quote:
I mean, it is really, really, really, really, really big, and we don't really understand it at all, but we must try. If we don't try to explain the universe, our current understanding will never get any better, and if we all give up we leave nothing behind when we die.
I absolutely agree...I just think we're going about it the wrong way. The Mayans seemed to know just as much as we do about Astronomy yet they never utilized a Telescope. The Tao explains almost identically what Quantum Physics has, but they never had to build a 3 mile long particle accellerator. Both actually just 'stared at their navals and said "AUM."

It's like, just because we obtain our information through big expensive machines and complex computations, that makes us the most informed. To me, it makes us extremely ignorant. Science doesn't desire to account for Experience. If it cannot be explained with Math or Theory (and tested), then it's not Science and not considered. Yet words and mathematics are just our best attempts at conveying any experience...words and math were created to convey an experience to begin with. Science has removed what they should have considering what Science is supposed to study....but they also removed the other 50% of what makes Life, Life. We need to reach a merger, but thankfully I see that day approaching faster than I thought.

Just remember, we're not learning anything new at all. Almost everthing we know, we've known in History but have forgot and just re-discovering it all over again. History repeats for a reason.
__________________

God appears, and God is light,
To those poor souls who dwell in night;
But does a human form display
To those who dwell in realms of day.

Ego Tripping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 10:33 PM   #13 (permalink)
the Echidna
 
effervescence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: newark
Posts: 2,825
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mannn..when are you all gonna learn..

there is no "universe"! it's all in your head! obviously. If you can't experience it outside of your consciousness then it's obbbbbbvvvviously not real. All your theories are just that: Theories.

now stop thinking and smoke a jay bOOOyyyyy
__________________
"...it is a strange world, a sad world, a world full of miseries, and woes, and troubles. And yet when King Laugh come, he make them all dance to the tune he play." ~ Abraham Van Helsing
effervescence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 08:57 AM   #14 (permalink)
Old School
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ego Tripping
Granted, but more suggesting is it than it isn't. We can't even find the smallest constituent of any particle of matter. We don't even fully know what matter IS. We haven't the slightest clue at what light is and it's the most abundant force in existance (and in some views, the only, everything else is just a side-product of Light).



I absolutely agree...I just think we're going about it the wrong way. The Mayans seemed to know just as much as we do about Astronomy yet they never utilized a Telescope. The Tao explains almost identically what Quantum Physics has, but they never had to build a 3 mile long particle accellerator. Both actually just 'stared at their navals and said "AUM."

It's like, just because we obtain our information through big expensive machines and complex computations, that makes us the most informed. To me, it makes us extremely ignorant. Science doesn't desire to account for Experience. If it cannot be explained with Math or Theory (and tested), then it's not Science and not considered. Yet words and mathematics are just our best attempts at conveying any experience...words and math were created to convey an experience to begin with. Science has removed what they should have considering what Science is supposed to study....but they also removed the other 50% of what makes Life, Life. We need to reach a merger, but thankfully I see that day approaching faster than I thought.

Just remember, we're not learning anything new at all. Almost everthing we know, we've known in History but have forgot and just re-discovering it all over again. History repeats for a reason.

I have to strongly disagree with several things you've said. First, Science doesn't desire to account for experience? What are you smoking (nevermind, I know exactly what you're smoking - it's what I wish I was smoking right now)? Science is based on experience. Empirical (read experiencal) evidence is the cornerstone of verifiable scientific claims. Science says that any theory running counter to experience must be false.

secondly, the mayans did not know nearly as much about astronomy as we (or modern day mayans - mexicans) do. They did have an extremely intricat calender that tracked complex astronomical phenomenon such as eclipses, but there's no evidence they knew about Quasars, black holes, curved space-time, or anything like that. What they knew is amazing, but they didn't know as much as us.

Yes, the Tao has passages concerning unknowability and such that are conceptually similar to quantum mechanics, but they are not the same. Quantum Mechanics allows you to construct models and equations that give probabilities over four-dimensional space-time of finding a giving particle - that's different than saying you can't know everything.

I agree that spirituality and the study of our own conciousness is both old and important, and that in those cases the wisdom of the ancients is quite illuminative. That doesn't mean science means nothing. History repeats itself in some ways, not in others; in any case, it's all about interpretation.

The saying "there's nothing new under the sun" has some instructive wisdom, but it's not true.
__________________
Nihilists, huh? Fuck me.
I mean, say what you want about the tenents of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos!
HunterThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 10:03 AM   #15 (permalink)
Are you in?
 
Ego Tripping's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,461
Thanks: 229
Thanked 657 Times in 438 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterThompson
I have to strongly disagree with several things you've said. First, Science doesn't desire to account for experience? What are you smoking (nevermind, I know exactly what you're smoking - it's what I wish I was smoking right now)? Science is based on experience. Empirical (read experiencal) evidence is the cornerstone of verifiable scientific claims. Science says that any theory running counter to experience must be false.
Near Death Experiences are not supported by the Scientific Community to be 'real experiences' but rather a figment of the imagination or Brain recieving lack of oxygen. Since they cannot replicate what the person sees, they say it's not true. Why is this, if Science is based off experiences and these people experienced something?

Quote:
secondly, the mayans did not know nearly as much about astronomy as we (or modern day mayans - mexicans) do. They did have an extremely intricat calender that tracked complex astronomical phenomenon such as eclipses, but there's no evidence they knew about Quasars, black holes, curved space-time, or anything like that. What they knew is amazing, but they didn't know as much as us.
And where has our information got us? What is true knowledge? Sure, we think we know how things work, but all we did was use intense technology to observe. We've found next to nothing that has actually improved the Human Race. At least they obtained something as useful as a Calender that is still accurate even today.

Quote:
Yes, the Tao has passages concerning unknowability and such that are conceptually similar to quantum mechanics, but they are not the same. Quantum Mechanics allows you to construct models and equations that give probabilities over four-dimensional space-time of finding a giving particle - that's different than saying you can't know everything.
Just different words trying to describe something formless and without description. Read the Tao Of Physics by Fritoj Capra if you want a mind-bend on how similiar the two studies actually are.

Quote:
I agree that spirituality and the study of our own conciousness is both old and important, and that in those cases the wisdom of the ancients is quite illuminative. That doesn't mean science means nothing. History repeats itself in some ways, not in others; in any case, it's all about interpretation.
I totally agree...

"Science without Religion is Lame, Religion without Science is Blind." - Einstein

Quote:
The saying "there's nothing new under the sun" has some instructive wisdom, but it's not true.
How so? Once again, what NEW information have we found out if we already know everything (which is nothing)?
__________________

God appears, and God is light,
To those poor souls who dwell in night;
But does a human form display
To those who dwell in realms of day.

Ego Tripping is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 10:15 AM   #16 (permalink)
Old School
 
ThePerfectDrug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,241
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
im thinking that the universe cant be grasped at all..in a scientific way, at least nothing more than saying what planets have what atmopsheres and things like that. It is interesting to me, but that is it. It inspires my wonder, but doesnt inspire me to know, and i like that. Its beautiful to me, and that is all.
__________________
I've heard you say many times
That you're better 'n no one
And no one is better 'n you.
If you really believe that,
You know you got
Nothing to win and nothing to lose.
From fixtures and forces and friends,
Your sorrow does stem,
That hype you and type you,
Making you feel
That you must be exactly like them.
ThePerfectDrug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 11:08 AM   #17 (permalink)
Down is the new up.
 
Paranoid Android's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 29
Thanked 36 Times in 31 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeta-burn
I have formulated a theory of the universe. it is in total agreeance with quantum mechanics general relativity string theory and supergravity. in basic it states that our universe, so to speak, is 3 different 'plates' that are our space in 3 different time zones, all linked by wormholes, and it is twisted in 11D. its hard to grasp at first, but once you understand it it relatively simple. when i can im gonna get a web page up about it. i have a notebook where i have written down all the pics and explanations behind it. What i like about it is that it can link science and spirituality as well as explain many to date 'unexplained phenomena', without introducing any insane concepts or ridiculously far fetched ideas. For now im not gonna say too much else about this theory till i can get a page up about it. i dont want my material to fall into the wrong hands alrite peace out for now. i gots lotta work 2 do :P
Someone watched SuperNova last night didnt they?

I know I did.
__________________
"We're not scaremongering, this is really happening."
Paranoid Android is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 02:52 PM   #18 (permalink)
Old School
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ego Tripping
Near Death Experiences are not supported by the Scientific Community to be 'real experiences' but rather a figment of the imagination or Brain recieving lack of oxygen. Since they cannot replicate what the person sees, they say it's not true. Why is this, if Science is based off experiences and these people experienced something?
You're misinterpreting. Science says there is no evidence to say that the experience is god calling to them or something like that. If you experience it, it's an experience; Science does not deny that. Science offers physiological explanations for why you may have had the experience, but it doesn't deny that it's an experience.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ego Tripping

And where has our information got us? What is true knowledge? Sure, we think we know how things work, but all we did was use intense technology to observe. We've found next to nothing that has actually improved the Human Race. At least they obtained something as useful as a Calender that is still accurate even today.
So I suppose living longer, having better nutrition, lower infant mortality, and safer living conditions mean nothing to you?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ego Tripping

Just different words trying to describe something formless and without description. Read the Tao Of Physics by Fritoj Capra if you want a mind-bend on how similiar the two studies actually are.
I've read the book. The point is, Quantum Physics allows us to make verifiable predictions about quanta - it's congruence with Taoist thought is interesting, but does not make Quantum THeory less valild. Reading the Tao will not enable you to build an Atomic Force Microscope. Quantum Physics will.
__________________
Nihilists, huh? Fuck me.
I mean, say what you want about the tenents of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos!
HunterThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 03:04 PM   #19 (permalink)
no custom. customize
 
snapshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The unOriginal Rorschach.
Posts: 19,305
Thanks: 15
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterThompson
I've read the book. The point is, Quantum Physics allows us to make verifiable predictions about quanta - it's congruence with Taoist thought is interesting, but does not make Quantum THeory less valild. Reading the Tao will not enable you to build an Atomic Force Microscope. Quantum Physics will.
But the reason for the existance of both is exactly the same.
__________________
We are all atheists about most of the gods that society has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
-Richard Dawkins
snapshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2004, 04:45 PM   #20 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeta-burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Out there
Posts: 517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
to the moron who said we dont know what light is:
its photons. photons you fuck. the lowest energy frequency of open strings. so uh, we do know what it is.
Zeta-burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design