YaHooka Forums  

Go Back   YaHooka Forums > The Chronic Colloquials > Politics And Current Affairs
Home Register FAQ Social Groups Links Mark Forums Read

Politics And Current Affairs Discussion on politics, current affairs and law. Do something today to make a difference.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-15-2009, 04:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
Hmm?
 
Maturin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Das Kapital
Posts: 1,849
Thanks: 93
Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
Obama backs down; Continues military tribunals for Gitmo detainees.

Change we can believe in.

From the WaPo


Quote:
Military Tribunals Will Resume, Obama Says

President Obama said today he will revive military commissions but with greater legal safeguards for defendants to try some terrorist suspects held at the military base in Cuba.

The decision, which follows an intense internal debate, represents something of a reversal by the president who said during the campaign that military courts martial or the federal courts offered a better route to successful prosecution because he said military commissions had been an "enormous failure."

In recent weeks, however, the administration appears to have bowed to fears articulated by the Pentagon that bringing some detainees before regular courts presented enormous legal hurdles and could risk acquittals.

"Military commissions have a long tradition in the United States," said Obama in a statement. "They are appropriate for trying enemies who violate the laws of war, provided that they are properly structured and administered."

The administration will seek a second continuance of proceedings at Guantanamo Bay to finalize reforms to the military commissions system, including a ban on the use of evidence obtained from coercive interrogations, limits on the use of hearsay, more latitude for detainees in selecting attorney, and protections for defendants who refuse to testify, Obama said.

Despite these changes, the decision will dismay civil liberties and human rights groups who had assumed that the administration had abandoned commissions when it sought a first suspension of proceedings immediately after Obama came into office.

"It is troubling that President Obama has apparently chosen to revive the flawed military commissions he rightly denounced during his campaign," said Virginia Sloan, president of the Constitution Project, a Washington think-tank.. "Military commissions are designed to provide lesser due process protections for terrorism suspects than our federal courts do. Throughout our nation's history, those courts have proven their ability to handle the most difficult and sensitive cases. President Obama should have demonstrated a return to the rule of law by ending the tainted military commission proceedings."
ad_icon

Obama noted that he has supported draft legislation on military commission in 2006 but rejected the final version supported by the Bush administration because "it failed to establish a legitimate legal framework and undermined our capability to ensure swift and certain justice against those detainees that we were holding at the time."

cont.


__________________
"Creating something is not a democracy. The people have no say. The artist does. It doesn't matter what the people witter on about: they and their response comes after. They're not there for the moment of creation."

--Russell T Davies
Maturin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 06:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
bougeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,644
Thanks: 703
Thanked 1,512 Times in 1,067 Posts
Yes, this pisses me off also. Moreso because of the continuance of the tribunals than obama flip flopping. How about you?
stoneric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 10:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
i love twi'lek girls
 
Mclennison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rhone Alps France
Posts: 500
Thanks: 30
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
sing love songs and give lots of peace signs to people as you walk by and that ole shtick

it'll work

swear

promise!!!
__________________
"we've got to get ourselves back to the garden!"
~from the song "woodstock"
Mclennison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 10:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
Old School
 
dubtrice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 408
Thanks: 87
Thanked 55 Times in 41 Posts
Guantanamo should stay and he knows it. Obama just took advantage of a million easy votes... people are so gullible.
dubtrice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 11:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
Xil
OD'ing on sobriety
 
Xil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mizzura
Posts: 3,334
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 1,158 Times in 717 Posts
obama can shove it up his ass
__________________
"we'll show these fascists what a couple of hillbillies can do"
Xil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 11:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Vem Para Ficar
 
al-Mu'akhkhir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: in some pussy
Posts: 3,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 351 Times in 270 Posts
surprise surprise america!
__________________
al-Mu'akhkhir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 10:39 AM   #7 (permalink)
bougeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,644
Thanks: 703
Thanked 1,512 Times in 1,067 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dubtrice View Post
Guantanamo should stay and he knows it. Obama just took advantage of a million easy votes... people are so gullible.
Speaking of gullible, anyone thinking gitmo should remain open would have to be the gulliblest of the gullible.
stoneric is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stoneric For This Useful Post:
Prophet Saddam (05-18-2009)
Old 05-17-2009, 10:50 AM   #8 (permalink)
Victoria Aut Mors
 
Roach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,182
Thanks: 2,372
Thanked 1,984 Times in 1,507 Posts
It's not foolish to be paranoid , sometimes.

There are some people in this big world who really would kill you if they had the chance.

Sucks, but it's part of this world we created which is based on; Ego, Hunger ,and Aggression.

The types of changes you all are seeking probably will not happen in Earth's lifetime...let alone yours.
__________________
לזיין את הקופים
Roach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 11:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
bougeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,644
Thanks: 703
Thanked 1,512 Times in 1,067 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiSaNtHrOpE View Post
It's not foolish to be paranoid , sometimes.

There are some people in this big world who really would kill you if they had the chance.

Sucks, but it's part of this world we created which is based on; Ego, Hunger ,and Aggression.

The types of changes you all are seeking probably will not happen in Earth's lifetime...let alone yours.
No doubt. Still doesn't make gitmo, or any place like it, necessary.
stoneric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 11:32 AM   #10 (permalink)
Victoria Aut Mors
 
Roach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,182
Thanks: 2,372
Thanked 1,984 Times in 1,507 Posts
where would you hold terrorists or national security threats until trial...allenwood ,pa ?

or Your home town .

Should they just be executed as war criminals first, then go to trial....probably not in a supposedly christian society.

yea, I agree shuting down the prison is the simple solution to a very complicated problem.


as former soldier, I'm strongly in favor of the old "take no prisoners" philosophy of the art of war..If it weren't for indecision on the battlefield you wouldn't have prisoners from any war, and no resulting aftermath of the same.

Goes something like this.......

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka - The Tamil Tiger rebels admitted defeat in their 25-year-old war with the Sri Lankan government Sunday, offering to lay down their guns as government forces swept across their last strongholds in the northeast.

The government rejected the last-ditch call for a cease-fire, saying the thousands of civilians trapped in the war zone all have escaped to safety and there was no longer any reason to stop the battle.

And don't just laugh it off.
Those orders have been given often.
__________________
לזיין את הקופים

Last edited by Roach; 05-17-2009 at 12:56 PM.
Roach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 02:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
bougeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,644
Thanks: 703
Thanked 1,512 Times in 1,067 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiSaNtHrOpE View Post
where would you hold terrorists or national security threats until trial...allenwood ,pa ?

or Your home town .

Should they just be executed as war criminals first, then go to trial....probably not in a supposedly christian society.

yea, I agree shuting down the prison is the simple solution to a very complicated problem.


as former soldier, I'm strongly in favor of the old "take no prisoners" philosophy of the art of war..If it weren't for indecision on the battlefield you wouldn't have prisoners from any war, and no resulting aftermath of the same.
What's the difference where you hold them? They're prisoners, not nuclear waste.

And fuck your kill "em all attitude
stoneric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 03:48 PM   #12 (permalink)
Clear Light
 
The Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In my head, somewhere.
Posts: 17,864
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 5,419 Times in 2,864 Posts
As disappointing as this is, I don't think anyone here is regretting not voting for McCain.

As for terrorists, they are a bogeyman, nothing more. How many people die each year because of terrorists? If there was consistency in our views toward protecting americans, imagine the effort we'd be putting into battling cancer right now.



The Rev
__________________


Budforce - My Friend
August 29, 1973- May 25, 2012


The Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Rev For This Useful Post:
Prophet Saddam (05-18-2009)
Old 05-17-2009, 04:09 PM   #13 (permalink)
Old School
 
dubtrice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 408
Thanks: 87
Thanked 55 Times in 41 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoneric View Post
What's the difference where you hold them? They're prisoners, not nuclear waste.

And fuck your kill "em all attitude
they're prisoners would could give two shits for whether or not you care about their well-being; to them, if you are American, you should die...

its not like we saw their heads off with machetes or anything............ .
dubtrice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 05:32 PM   #14 (permalink)
bougeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,644
Thanks: 703
Thanked 1,512 Times in 1,067 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dubtrice View Post
they're prisoners would could give two shits for whether or not you care about their well-being; to them, if you are American, you should die...

its not like we saw their heads off with machetes or anything............ .
Christ, you've swallowed cheney's kool aid.
stoneric is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stoneric For This Useful Post:
Prophet Saddam (05-18-2009)
Old 05-17-2009, 06:17 PM   #15 (permalink)
Old School
 
dubtrice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 408
Thanks: 87
Thanked 55 Times in 41 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoneric View Post
Christ, you've swallowed cheney's kool aid.
??
dubtrice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 08:00 PM   #16 (permalink)
Hmm?
 
Maturin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Das Kapital
Posts: 1,849
Thanks: 93
Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoneric View Post
Yes, this pisses me off also. Moreso because of the continuance of the tribunals than obama flip flopping. How about you?
I'm ultimately pleased with this, though not for the reasons you might originally think of. I don't think Obama "flip-flopped" on this; that would suggest he did it for politically easy reasons, and I think the opposite is true in this case. He changed his position despite the fact that this is a very unpopular move with a large chunk of his base.

I have many issues with Obama's domestic and fiscal policies, but in foreign policy he's showing himself to be a moderate, and willing to base his decisions on what he now knows as president instead of what he said on the campaign trail. And the closing of Gitmo and ending the tribunals was a BIG plank of his. The fact that he's doing a 180 on this shows a man whose willing to change his position if he thinks it's best for the safety of Americans. That shows a mark of politically maturity; remembering a chief criticism of W was that he never changed his views no matter what.

Now I'm still uncertain as to why a courts martial isn't as good as a tribunal, or if Obama is still set on his original plan to close Gitmo. As someone else said in this thread, the terrorists do have to be held *somewhere*, though why not Allentown or St. Louis or Area 51?
__________________
"Creating something is not a democracy. The people have no say. The artist does. It doesn't matter what the people witter on about: they and their response comes after. They're not there for the moment of creation."

--Russell T Davies
Maturin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 08:03 PM   #17 (permalink)
bougeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,644
Thanks: 703
Thanked 1,512 Times in 1,067 Posts
Tribunals don't make americans safe.
stoneric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 09:15 PM   #18 (permalink)
Freedom Bird
 
Sugar420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,138
Thanks: 41
Thanked 179 Times in 730 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maturin View Post
The fact that he's doing a 180 on this shows a man whose willing to change his position if he thinks it's best for the safety of Americans. That shows a mark of politically maturity; remembering a chief criticism of W was that he never changed his views no matter what.
no, this shows that all his campaign promises were empty talk as i said before the election, and what you call "political maturity" is really a sign of the corruption than comes from playing the game of bourgeois electoral politics.

as for W, he also broke campaign promises
Sugar420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2009, 11:35 PM   #19 (permalink)
Reelin' in the Years
 
Psilocychosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Long and Winding Road
Posts: 469
Thanks: 22
Thanked 58 Times in 49 Posts
This is bullshit. Shutting down gitmo would have been a great first step to undue all the injustices our country has committed. I thought obama was going to bring about positive change instead of buckling under pressure. Or is he just another political machine fueled by false promises.

Give them a fair trial, I'm pretty sure thats what the constitution was built on.
__________________
Life gave me lemons, I didn't make no lemonade, threw the fuckin' lemons back and busted out the Cabernet

Psilocychosis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2009, 07:22 AM   #20 (permalink)
bougeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,644
Thanks: 703
Thanked 1,512 Times in 1,067 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maturin View Post
Now I'm still uncertain as to why a courts martial isn't as good as a tribunal, or if Obama is still set on his original plan to close Gitmo. As someone else said in this thread, the terrorists do have to be held *somewhere*, though why not Allentown or St. Louis or Area 51?
In a court martial you have a semblence of rights. Also if your innocent you go free, whereas in a military tribunal that's not necessarily the case.

Maybe obama is being pragmatic, that word that pops up after all of our illegal or immoral activities.
stoneric is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design