YaHooka Forums  

Go Back   YaHooka Forums > The Chronic Colloquials > Politics And Current Affairs
Home Register FAQ Social Groups Links Mark Forums Read

Politics And Current Affairs Discussion on politics, current affairs and law. Do something today to make a difference.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-14-2009, 02:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Hmm?
 
Maturin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Das Kapital
Posts: 1,849
Thanks: 93
Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
Congress votes to regulate tobacco.

Considering the large contingent of voices here that demand the government has no say in what we put in our bodies, I'm surprised no one else has even mentioned this story before now. Surprised, and oddly dissappointed.

Where's the outrage Yahooka?

Congress approves FDA regulation of tobacco.


Quote:
By a ratio of 3 to 1, the House of Representatives yesterday approved the Senate version of a bill that gives the federal government sweeping new powers to regulate tobacco.
"This is the day when Americans can begin to truly kick the habit, with the full force of our laws marshaled to protect consumers, and especially our young people," said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), a key sponsor of the House version of the bill.

The House had already passed a nearly identical version of the bill in April, but it needed to ratify the Senate's action and did so by a vote of 307 to 97.

President Obama, himself a smoker who has struggled to quit, congratulated lawmakers. "We've known for years, even decades, about the harmful, addictive and often deadly effects of tobacco products," he said. "Each year, Americans pay nearly $100 billion in added health-care costs due to smoking. Each day, about 1,000 young people under the age of 18 become regular smokers."

The legislation gives the Food and Drug Administration authority to regulate the advertising, marketing and manufacturing of tobacco products. Tobacco is used by one in five Americans, yet it is one of the least-regulated consumer products. Pet food and cosmetics are more heavily controlled by the government.

...

The $89 billion tobacco industry will be required to disclose the ingredients in cigarettes and other tobacco products and will face severe limitations on how they are advertised and promoted.

The legislation stops short of allowing the FDA to prohibit tobacco or to eliminate nicotine, the addictive drug in tobacco.

Congress has been battling for more than a decade over regulating tobacco, coming close several times but faltering in the face of procedural hang-ups or opposition from the tobacco lobby or the White House. Over the years, changing social attitudes toward smoking have helped transform the suggestion of regulating tobacco from controversial to common sense.


__________________
"Creating something is not a democracy. The people have no say. The artist does. It doesn't matter what the people witter on about: they and their response comes after. They're not there for the moment of creation."

--Russell T Davies
Maturin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 03:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Clear Light
 
The Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In my head, somewhere.
Posts: 17,864
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 5,419 Times in 2,864 Posts
Between the war, the out of control spending, the unjust laws, and all that, I'm just burnt out on outrage. I've decided that giving up all hope is the most rational course of action.



The Rev
__________________


Budforce - My Friend
August 29, 1973- May 25, 2012


The Rev is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Rev For This Useful Post:
Mydriasis (06-14-2009)
Old 06-14-2009, 06:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
Mafutero
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PR
Posts: 782
Thanks: 41
Thanked 169 Times in 131 Posts
You know, I do think that the government should have no say in what I put in my body, as long as I do it voluntarily, but people don't use tobacco voluntarily, they do it because its an addiction to the nicotine, they may have started out voluntarily, you know curiosity, just wanted to try it, but then they can't quit, even if they want to, and thats wrong, and if the government has to intervene with that then so be it if its for the good of the citizens, but as we all know, theres always something hidden with these bills and shit, so even if I would like the government to regulate tobacco I say fuck em cause they're probably gonna do it for profit instead of the people's health, if not they could have done so years ago...
zerodown is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to zerodown For This Useful Post:
Canuck Wisdom (06-14-2009)
Old 06-14-2009, 06:53 PM   #4 (permalink)
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 341
Thanks: 22
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maturin View Post
Considering the large contingent of voices here that demand the government has no say in what we put in our bodies, I'm surprised no one else has even mentioned this story before now. Surprised, and oddly dissappointed.
Giving the FDA the ability to regulate tobacco is like giving a pack of foxes the keys to the henhouse. From what I've been seeing, half the FDA is pharaceutical executives and the other half is Monsanto executives.

Expect an FDA approved study in 2 years (blasted from coast to coast during primetime) that tobacco is good for you...

...as a medical marijuana patient, I have concerns, particularly about pesticides. Making sure cannabis that is sold or distributed is free of pesticides is a proper function of government, if you ask me.

As it is, this is a truly brilliant move by the tobacco companies. I'm sure many starving scientists will agree.

And thanks for posting about it. I almost posted about it here several times.

Last edited by Guest; 06-14-2009 at 06:56 PM.
Guest is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Guest For This Useful Post:
Dr. Nick Nasty (06-15-2009)
Old 06-14-2009, 06:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Spiraling Out
 
badgoalie85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,085
Thanks: 97
Thanked 454 Times in 288 Posts
while i think that there is an unnecessarily large anti-tobacco sentiment in congress as well as in the country, i'm not as outraged by this as i am by the current regulations we have concerning marijuana and some other drugs. i mean, there's a big difference in increasing taxes by a buck a pack on a drug and actually throwing people in jail for using a drug.
__________________
Pursue happiness.

To each his own.
badgoalie85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 08:20 PM   #6 (permalink)
Old School
 
dubtrice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 408
Thanks: 87
Thanked 55 Times in 41 Posts
Wooo! Take down big tobacco! I really need to quit smoking!
dubtrice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 08:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
Do Not Resuscitate
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,293
Thanks: 840
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
It's pretty obvious the people no longer have a say in what goes on here.
Mydriasis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 11:41 PM   #8 (permalink)
Do Not Resuscitate
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,293
Thanks: 840
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts

Last edited by Mydriasis; 06-14-2009 at 11:43 PM.
Mydriasis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mydriasis For This Useful Post:
The Rev (06-15-2009)
Old 06-15-2009, 09:19 AM   #9 (permalink)
vibing
 
msicidron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North America
Posts: 959
Thanks: 229
Thanked 157 Times in 122 Posts
"This is the day when Americans can begin to truly kick the habit, with the full force of our laws marshaled to protect consumers, and especially our young people," said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), a key sponsor of the House version of the bill.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT

that makes me want to light myself on fire.. to think that anyone might actually believe with their whole heart that some stricter regulation might GIVE PEOPLE THE ABILITY to quit smoking... but most likely the usual hollow politician speak.
__________________
||||||||||||||||||||||||
msicidron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 03:29 PM   #10 (permalink)
Reactionary Radical
 
Dr. Nick Nasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York/New Jersey Metro Wasteland
Posts: 1,049
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 653
Thanked 364 Times in 232 Posts
Please note that Phillip Morris actually backed this thing---it's really a tobacco monopolization bill sold to us in the guise of public health...the State will never end tobacco's legality--its tax revenues serve too many useful purposes..from building stadiums for billionaires to cynically funding healthcare. This just weeded out the competition so the biggest of big tobacco could dominate the market. Fascism, all for the children.
__________________

"I do not wish any mass at all, but honest men only, lovely, sweet, accomplished women only."-Emma Goldman
Dr. Nick Nasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 03:38 PM   #11 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 433
Thanks: 25
Thanked 49 Times in 41 Posts
they are just making hay. this won't become law
__________________
"The highest realms of thought are impossible to reach without first attaining to an understanding of compassion" SOCRATES, 470-399 BC
seattle420lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 05:38 PM   #12 (permalink)
Old School
 
dubtrice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 408
Thanks: 87
Thanked 55 Times in 41 Posts
i just figure if cigs get more expensive, ill be more likely to stop, or at least slow down
dubtrice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 07:23 AM   #13 (permalink)
Hmm?
 
Maturin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Das Kapital
Posts: 1,849
Thanks: 93
Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattle420lover View Post
they are just making hay. this won't become law
Dude, do you pay attention to the news? Both houses of Congress have already passed it, and Obama will say he'll sign. It's a sure deal.

Here's one aspect of the law that I thought someone else might bring up. Concerning legalization, I think many would want the government to deal with mj much the same way it deals with tobacco. Now the new laws doesn't let the FDA eliminate nicotine from tobacco, but it does allow the possibility for it to limit how much nicotine there is.

The key question is: What if the government legalized marijuana but put a cap on how much THC there could be? Would people accept that trade off?
__________________
"Creating something is not a democracy. The people have no say. The artist does. It doesn't matter what the people witter on about: they and their response comes after. They're not there for the moment of creation."

--Russell T Davies
Maturin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 07:38 AM   #14 (permalink)
Mafutero
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PR
Posts: 782
Thanks: 41
Thanked 169 Times in 131 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maturin View Post
Dude, do you pay attention to the news? Both houses of Congress have already passed it, and Obama will say he'll sign. It's a sure deal.

Here's one aspect of the law that I thought someone else might bring up. Concerning legalization, I think many would want the government to deal with mj much the same way it deals with tobacco. Now the new laws doesn't let the FDA eliminate nicotine from tobacco, but it does allow the possibility for it to limit how much nicotine there is.

The key question is: What if the government legalized marijuana but put a cap on how much THC there could be? Would people accept that trade off?
No, because the government will just put that cap at an extremely low level. The government doesn't have to control our lifes any more than they do, actually let me rephrase that, YOU PEOPLE don't need to control yourselves as much as you do, don't blame the government, they can only do what you allow them to do, blame yourselves for not standing up and demanding the government to stop fucking up, you pay their salaries your the boss, give your employee some orders...
zerodown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 07:54 AM   #15 (permalink)
Vem Para Ficar
 
al-Mu'akhkhir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: in some pussy
Posts: 3,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 351 Times in 270 Posts
pics of obama smoking?
__________________
al-Mu'akhkhir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 10:33 AM   #16 (permalink)
Hmm?
 
Maturin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Das Kapital
Posts: 1,849
Thanks: 93
Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by al-Mu'akhkhir View Post
pics of obama smoking?
Nothing I saw that wasn't obviously photoshopped, but this one was pretty funny:
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Creating something is not a democracy. The people have no say. The artist does. It doesn't matter what the people witter on about: they and their response comes after. They're not there for the moment of creation."

--Russell T Davies
Maturin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 10:48 AM   #17 (permalink)
Radical Dreamer
 
verklingen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 8,005
Thanks: 811
Thanked 1,491 Times in 946 Posts
^ obv fake, niggas all about the chili cheese fritos
__________________

“Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.”
rip matt
verklingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 10:50 AM   #18 (permalink)
Kung-Fu Jew
 
crookedhatinator45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tyrannosaurusonto, On
Posts: 4,147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 378 Times in 301 Posts
i wonder what teh Robb Kelly and his feets think about it
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sk3tchyD4ZO
no doubt. the first place i had these was at Space Camp.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Former President Hayes View Post
stfu with this pretend bullshit cutesy "lol @ bears"
you don't know what its like to like in CONSTANT threat of bear attack.you don't even FUCKING KNOW.

Quote:
Originally Posted by v3d4 View Post
note to self: veda, you decided not to look at this thread anymore.

♫ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲ ̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılı ♫
crookedhatinator45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2009, 11:44 AM   #19 (permalink)
Kung-Fu Jew
 
crookedhatinator45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tyrannosaurusonto, On
Posts: 4,147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 378 Times in 301 Posts
why'd our r.kelly get banned anyway? did he piss on illest or something?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sk3tchyD4ZO
no doubt. the first place i had these was at Space Camp.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Former President Hayes View Post
stfu with this pretend bullshit cutesy "lol @ bears"
you don't know what its like to like in CONSTANT threat of bear attack.you don't even FUCKING KNOW.

Quote:
Originally Posted by v3d4 View Post
note to self: veda, you decided not to look at this thread anymore.

♫ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲ ̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılı ♫
crookedhatinator45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 10:15 AM   #20 (permalink)
Spiraling Out
 
badgoalie85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,085
Thanks: 97
Thanked 454 Times in 288 Posts
Cigarettes killed my father...and raped my mother!
__________________
Pursue happiness.

To each his own.
badgoalie85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design