![]() |
|
|||||||
| Politics And Current Affairs Discussion on politics, current affairs and law. Do something today to make a difference. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Hmm?
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Das Kapital
Posts: 1,849
Thanks: 93
Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
|
Congress votes to regulate tobacco.
Considering the large contingent of voices here that demand the government has no say in what we put in our bodies, I'm surprised no one else has even mentioned this story before now. Surprised, and oddly dissappointed.
Where's the outrage Yahooka? Congress approves FDA regulation of tobacco. Quote:
__________________
"Creating something is not a democracy. The people have no say. The artist does. It doesn't matter what the people witter on about: they and their response comes after. They're not there for the moment of creation." --Russell T Davies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Clear Light
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In my head, somewhere.
Posts: 17,864
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 5,419 Times in 2,864 Posts
|
Between the war, the out of control spending, the unjust laws, and all that, I'm just burnt out on outrage. I've decided that giving up all hope is the most rational course of action.
![]() The Rev |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to The Rev For This Useful Post: | Mydriasis (06-14-2009) |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Mafutero
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PR
Posts: 782
Thanks: 41
Thanked 169 Times in 131 Posts
|
You know, I do think that the government should have no say in what I put in my body, as long as I do it voluntarily, but people don't use tobacco voluntarily, they do it because its an addiction to the nicotine, they may have started out voluntarily, you know curiosity, just wanted to try it, but then they can't quit, even if they want to, and thats wrong, and if the government has to intervene with that then so be it if its for the good of the citizens, but as we all know, theres always something hidden with these bills and shit, so even if I would like the government to regulate tobacco I say fuck em cause they're probably gonna do it for profit instead of the people's health, if not they could have done so years ago...
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to zerodown For This Useful Post: | Canuck Wisdom (06-14-2009) |
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 341
Thanks: 22
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
|
Quote:
Expect an FDA approved study in 2 years (blasted from coast to coast during primetime) that tobacco is good for you... ...as a medical marijuana patient, I have concerns, particularly about pesticides. Making sure cannabis that is sold or distributed is free of pesticides is a proper function of government, if you ask me. As it is, this is a truly brilliant move by the tobacco companies. I'm sure many starving scientists will agree. And thanks for posting about it. I almost posted about it here several times. Last edited by Guest; 06-14-2009 at 06:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Guest For This Useful Post: | Dr. Nick Nasty (06-15-2009) |
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Spiraling Out
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,085
Thanks: 97
Thanked 454 Times in 288 Posts
|
while i think that there is an unnecessarily large anti-tobacco sentiment in congress as well as in the country, i'm not as outraged by this as i am by the current regulations we have concerning marijuana and some other drugs. i mean, there's a big difference in increasing taxes by a buck a pack on a drug and actually throwing people in jail for using a drug.
__________________
Pursue happiness. To each his own. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
vibing
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North America
Posts: 959
Thanks: 229
Thanked 157 Times in 122 Posts
|
"This is the day when Americans can begin to truly kick the habit, with the full force of our laws marshaled to protect consumers, and especially our young people," said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), a key sponsor of the House version of the bill.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT that makes me want to light myself on fire.. to think that anyone might actually believe with their whole heart that some stricter regulation might GIVE PEOPLE THE ABILITY to quit smoking... but most likely the usual hollow politician speak.
__________________
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Reactionary Radical
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York/New Jersey Metro Wasteland
Posts: 1,049
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 653
Thanked 364 Times in 232 Posts
|
Please note that Phillip Morris actually backed this thing---it's really a tobacco monopolization bill sold to us in the guise of public health...the State will never end tobacco's legality--its tax revenues serve too many useful purposes..from building stadiums for billionaires to cynically funding healthcare. This just weeded out the competition so the biggest of big tobacco could dominate the market. Fascism, all for the children.
__________________
![]() "I do not wish any mass at all, but honest men only, lovely, sweet, accomplished women only."-Emma Goldman |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
YaHookan
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 433
Thanks: 25
Thanked 49 Times in 41 Posts
|
they are just making hay. this won't become law
__________________
"The highest realms of thought are impossible to reach without first attaining to an understanding of compassion" SOCRATES, 470-399 BC
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Hmm?
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Das Kapital
Posts: 1,849
Thanks: 93
Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
|
Dude, do you pay attention to the news? Both houses of Congress have already passed it, and Obama will say he'll sign. It's a sure deal.
Here's one aspect of the law that I thought someone else might bring up. Concerning legalization, I think many would want the government to deal with mj much the same way it deals with tobacco. Now the new laws doesn't let the FDA eliminate nicotine from tobacco, but it does allow the possibility for it to limit how much nicotine there is. The key question is: What if the government legalized marijuana but put a cap on how much THC there could be? Would people accept that trade off?
__________________
"Creating something is not a democracy. The people have no say. The artist does. It doesn't matter what the people witter on about: they and their response comes after. They're not there for the moment of creation." --Russell T Davies |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Mafutero
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PR
Posts: 782
Thanks: 41
Thanked 169 Times in 131 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Hmm?
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Das Kapital
Posts: 1,849
Thanks: 93
Thanked 88 Times in 65 Posts
|
Nothing I saw that wasn't obviously photoshopped, but this one was pretty funny:
__________________
"Creating something is not a democracy. The people have no say. The artist does. It doesn't matter what the people witter on about: they and their response comes after. They're not there for the moment of creation." --Russell T Davies |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |||
|
Kung-Fu Jew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tyrannosaurusonto, On
Posts: 4,147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 378 Times in 301 Posts
|
i wonder what teh Robb Kelly and his feets think about it
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
♫ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲ ̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılı ♫ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |||
|
Kung-Fu Jew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tyrannosaurusonto, On
Posts: 4,147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 378 Times in 301 Posts
|
why'd our r.kelly get banned anyway? did he piss on illest or something?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
♫ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲ ̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılı ♫ |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|