Mafoo

both sides of the political 'news' spectrum are equally and oppositely biased. get your information from bbc, they tend to let your decide your own opinion rather than giving you one.

fuck glen beck, that man reminds me of a fifth grader who lost the student council election

__________________
PLUR
For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return

John F. Kerry

if u want a really good example of what your saying here , listen to robert gibbs or obama talk sometimes...

i mean they really take this finely crafted message thing to the nth degree.


obama specifically wants to make this fox issue not a major issue (even tho it clearly has become one) so his choice focus tested phrase- "i just dont lose too much sleep over fox news".... perfectly bulshitingly designed to make the issue that HE made an issue not really an issue.


robert gibbs does this 20x a day at every news conference.


i guess on the one hand people dont want to be like bush and tell it like it is and tell it from the gut, but on the other hand all this meandering and focus tested phrases makes the dems and obama seem fake and phony and just as the party of poll-readers and focus groups.

__________________
Nasa under Obama

JcP

I do watch O'Reilly on occasion. NEWS, however, is not opinion journalism. O'Reilly uses news to forward an agenda. That is not news journalism, that is (again) opinion journalism.
The thing that makes FOX unique is that their "news" programming with Shephard Smith, the other white dude, and the crazy blond ladies are ALSO opinion journalism. What they report is not based on importance or relevance, but political agenda. And how they report it is equally propogandic. This is NOT a symptom of other news networks to the obscene degree it is as FOX (terrorist fist jab was on their NEWS show, not their talking-head show).

What the white house is saying is that the channel is not a news channel. Just because it calls itself one does not mean it is one. They are claiming its equivalent to talkradio.
Talk Radio can be handled however the white house wants to. He can invite liberal talk radio hosts to sit in the oval office for tea and crumpets and never even look at conservative talk radio hosts.

Again, I happen to think excluding Fox News from the basic news interviews and press conferences is a little far (and I HATE Fox News for what it does to this country). But I see nothing different this time from the last eight years except the "sides" have changed. Now the conservatives aren't in charge and suddenly this is UNFAIR! Well, you should have thought of that before you did it to liberals. This same schizophrenic behavior can be seen across the board: conservative administration: PASS THE PATRIOT ACT! GIVE THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AS MUCH POWER AS POSSIBLE!. Liberal Administration: Executive branch as too much power. He's turning this country socialist! He must be stopped! The people must be heard! Conservative administration: Filibusters are wrong! Liberals are destroying the congressional process on a technicality! Liberal administration: Filibusters are necessary! Liberals are destroying congress and wemust USE a technicality to stop them!
And now: Conservative administration: do you blame the administration for not talking to liberal biased channels? They don't give him a fair shot! Liberal administration: BLAME THE ADMINISTRATION FOR NOT TALKING TO A CONSERVATIVE CHANNEL! HE'S A PUSSY!

Frankly, hindsight should be able to teach people how not to behave. And yes, there are two sides to this type of example (why are liberals continuing the cycle?), but on this specific example, I have no compassion for Fox News for reaping what they sowed.

__________________

Just look out around us, people fightin their wars...
They think they'll be happy when they've settled their scores...
Let's lay down our weapons
and hold us apart
be still for just a minute
try to open our hearts
MORE LOVE.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rev It's not what you see, it's that you're looking.

JcP

this has nothing to do with muting conservatives. This has to do with removing Fox News from the "news" networks and giving it its rightful place in the entertainment/opinion networks.

There is no call to remove TWJ from reporting. Or The NYP. Or any number of conservative leaning newspapers.
Why? Because their news and opinion pages are more often than not SEPERATE.

I don't think you understand this issue completely since your examples are missing the point a little. This is not about silencing critique or conservatives. This is about stopping the GOP-propoganda machine from masquerading as legitamate UNBIASED news.

__________________

Just look out around us, people fightin their wars...
They think they'll be happy when they've settled their scores...
Let's lay down our weapons
and hold us apart
be still for just a minute
try to open our hearts
MORE LOVE.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rev It's not what you see, it's that you're looking.

John F. Kerry

when people consider liberal news unbiased its kinda hard to argue much further with them about how to keep things neutral

__________________
Nasa under Obama

Ego Tripping

Yeah, imagine that same rally during 2000-2008. Now imagine it was majorly helped if not out-rightly organized by MSNBC or CNN. One would look at those "news networks" and say "Hmm, you know, they really are crossing the line in terms of what is considered news by actually rallying together on an idea that they conceived" (9/12 project). Those same people would have been called domestic terrorists. Although what's funny is these people actually do carry weapons to rallies. Fox's implicit involvement with it showed their true colors. No network that calls itself news should ever, ever engage in the behavior they engage in. To do so is to move away from being a news network and into...well, whatever they turned into. Fair and balanced? Sure, if you're rich, white, religious and (possibly) racist. Then it's completely truth while every single other network is liberal? Please. When 9 out of 10 networks say one thing and 1 says another, it's clearly not liberalism but reality. It's ironic I admit...Fox News watchers think there's some giant liberal media conspiracy yet when you mention 9/11 possibly being a conspiracy, those same people have a shitfit.

Which is what you fail to look at j. Fox News isn't news anymore. Perhaps they once reported the news and perhaps they might mince some up into their programming now, but they have crossed into, what I feel Obama aptly called, "talk radio." They are a propaganda machine and granted, nearly all mainstream media news can be left or right leaning, they are unlike anything we've ever seen in recent years. They deserved to be re-classified as entertainment. Kudos to Obama to actually having the balls to say it.

__________________

Mydriasis

At least they are openly biased. I think it's better that way, then being spoon fed 95% news with 5% mind control. Cuz I can see fox news and be like lolz change the channel, but when I watch other news channels it's hard to sift the truth from the persuasion.

I was in a protest that got covered by local news and they twisted everything to make us look like ass-holes when people got maced down and arrested for holding signs and standing outside of a building after we had permission to be there(sure some people called the cops pussies and shit but freedom of speech). So trust me shit does get flipped around on every channel.

Whether fox news is biased journalism or news or not or w/e the fuck you want to call it, a lot of people only watch it, so they might as well be able to be in the know just like every other news channel.

That's just my opinion, I don't see why it's so hard to understand. I believe I should be able to cover a story about the white-house if I wanted too, I'm a libertarian.

let the dumb asses who rely on fox news for information fall by their own folly.

Just because something is wrong doesn't mean it should have to shut up. And if that was true then who is to fucking judge? If it was me I would have muted thousands of people. But instead I invite lies and misconception to be spoken to me everyday because that is how people are. Disgusting, pitiful, and bored.

__________________

John F. Kerry

how are u people talking about Sean Hannity as ANY WORSE than Keith Olberman ?

seriously?


how are u not talking about how they put all the gay and progressive people on msnbc and have them hoighty toightilly talking about how everyone but latte sipping liberals are just retards and sideshows ....

?

its fine if they do that but not if fox news has entertainment for its audience as well?

really, like mydriasis said they whole point is recognize the bias and recognize your own bias too.


and if obama is gonna talk to one he should talk to all,

__________________
Nasa under Obama

JcP

No they are NOT. Which is the entire problem. Drop the "fair and balanced" bullshit and admit who they are and we can move on.

Most people KNOW they are biased and not "fair and balanced" but a lot of people watch that channel for their news. It's disgusting. And, if you ask me, damaging to this country.

__________________

Just look out around us, people fightin their wars...
They think they'll be happy when they've settled their scores...
Let's lay down our weapons
and hold us apart
be still for just a minute
try to open our hearts
MORE LOVE.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rev It's not what you see, it's that you're looking.

stoneric

how are u not talking about how they put all the heterosexuals and stale status quo war pigs on fox and have them cowboy tough talking about how everyone but black coffee drinking conservatives are just commie appeasers and wimps........

John F. Kerry

i recognize the bias on both sides,

im not the one whos wringing his hands (obama) and saying those damn foxers are out to get me even tho a bunch of the people who watch it voted for me or else how else could i have won last novermber?

i just hope obama doesnt get it in his mind that its jewish news writers who are against him next, or some other minority...

because we all see how obama and david "the nutcracker" axelrod deal with people who they think are against their plans...


see :30 for a pretty good analysis of the "chicago way" that obama and his footsoldiers are engaging in .

__________________
Nasa under Obama

Mydriasis

JCP how are you to decide what is damaging to this country? No offense but your name isn't written in any religious doctrine.

Some people want this world to end on 2012 but that movie about it is still gonna come out.

I think Miley Cyrus is just and dangerous as fox news. if someone is dumb enough to take fox news's words as gospel then let them live that way.

If people need to get by on conservatism and ignorance then let them, we can't tell people how to live imo.

__________________

Ego Tripping

The National Inquirer isn't allowed at meeting and there's a reason for that; it's entertainment, not a quality, credible source of news. This isn't about Fox being allowed to exist or not, or stopping people from listening to it, it's just not treating it as a credible source of news anymore. Much as The Daily Show is becoming a borderline news show, Fox is transforming into something else entirely. The Onion is more objective journalism than whatever Fox has been doing lately.

__________________

kameelyun

@7:00

The famous "sniff, sniff... I'm sorry, I just love my country..."

__________________
"The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off." - Gloria Steinem

JcP

is "if you ask me" not enough of a disclaimer? I'm not one to decide. I AM one to have an opinion. Stop trying to pick fights.

If you wish to discuss why, IF YOU ASK ME, I think Fox nws is damaging to this country, I'll be happy to discuss it with you.

__________________

Just look out around us, people fightin their wars...
They think they'll be happy when they've settled their scores...
Let's lay down our weapons
and hold us apart
be still for just a minute
try to open our hearts
MORE LOVE.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Rev It's not what you see, it's that you're looking.

John F. Kerry

jcp i duno if u have me on ignore i think u do, but im just wondering if u think msnbc is equally biased to fox or no ?

__________________
Nasa under Obama

Ego Tripping

MSNBC is the other end of the spectrum and it's most certainly biased...

...but it doesn't try and organize and support protests and demonstrations to support one side of a particular political party, because that wouldn't be called journalism.

Get it?

__________________

Mydriasis

I didn't mean to pick a fight jcp I just get so frusterated when it comes to politics, I apologize.

__________________

verklingen

i'm starting to think fox news' tagline is more of an ideological crusade than a commitment to truth. it seems to me that the owners want to use their broadcasting power to balance reality with the beliefs of their audience to cultivate the fruition of their goal: stop any momentum for progress and keep the status quo. and so they put out spins and misconceptions designed to tap peoples' emotions and keep them outraged at change. this not only exacerbates the natural inclination of many people, but also provides relief, comfort. this cycle keeps them addicted, and those in charge take advantage of it for their own benefit.

really, it's like its own separate world there on fox news. sure they report on regular news stories, but they also create their own. it's like the ultimate troll tbh

__________________

“Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.”

verklingen

this lays it out pretty well

__________________

“Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.”