YaHooka Forums  

Go Back   YaHooka Forums > The Chronic Colloquials > Politics And Current Affairs
Home FAQ Social Groups Links Mark Forums Read

Politics And Current Affairs Discussion on politics, current affairs and law. Do something today to make a difference.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 4.00 average. Display Modes
Old 03-14-2010, 03:25 PM   #21 (permalink)
YaHookan
 
Entity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: On the other side of your screen.
Posts: 251
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 35
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
Umm.. who the hell are WE to tell other nations they can and can't have nuclear weapons?

I mean, Jesus Christ... Pakistan and India BOTH have them and those are some fucktarded bastards...and even they haven't used them.

So far, the US is the only nation that's actually USED them.
Way to lead by example, eh?
__________________
"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes."
-- Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court

"Fifty men have run America, and thats a high figure."
-- Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.[/CENTER]
Entity is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Entity For This Useful Post:
verklingen (03-19-2010)
Old 03-19-2010, 06:13 AM   #22 (permalink)
SoK
mentally ill
 
SoK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,336
Thanks: 403
Thanked 1,019 Times in 658 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Entity View Post
Umm.. who the hell are WE to tell other nations they can and can't have nuclear weapons?

I mean, Jesus Christ... Pakistan and India BOTH have them and those are some fucktarded bastards...and even they haven't used them.

So far, the US is the only nation that's actually USED them.
Way to lead by example, eh?
Having a nuclear weapon turns a nation into a fucktarded bastard. I don't propose a 2003 type invasion of Iran, but a 1991 type invasion. Go in there and conduct some air strikes, leave, and Ahmadinejad becomes Saddam II.

We would demand oil in exchange for financial assistance to Iranian citizens. This would ensure Iranian government gets no money for their oil, but instead the citizens get it. Allow them to continue a nuclear energy program...
SoK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 06:32 AM   #23 (permalink)
Radical Dreamer
 
verklingen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 11,175
Thanks: 806
Thanked 1,472 Times in 937 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by stateofkane View Post
Having a nuclear weapon turns a nation into a fucktarded bastard. I don't propose a 2003 type invasion of Iran, but a 1991 type invasion. Go in there and conduct some air strikes, leave, and Ahmadinejad becomes Saddam II.
have you noticed how people in iran are willing to have themselves killed to protest the fucker, and yet you're saying we should invade their country and prop him up as our puppet? wtf

Quote:
Originally Posted by stateofkane View Post
We would demand oil in exchange for financial assistance to Iranian citizens. This would ensure Iranian government gets no money for their oil, but instead the citizens get it. Allow them to continue a nuclear energy program...
right! we make it so ahmadinejad can no longer fuck the iranians out of their natural resources, so WE can! ??????????
__________________

“Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.”
rip matt
verklingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 09:54 AM   #24 (permalink)
SoK
mentally ill
 
SoK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,336
Thanks: 403
Thanked 1,019 Times in 658 Posts
It doesn't matter what we think should happen, so we might as well have some fun with politics by throwing original ideas out there, even if they don't make sense.

Terry, big deal. That sounds good and is probably the best option, but what fun is it to write down an unoriginal idea that has already been thought of? Try an idea of your own...
SoK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 01:46 PM   #25 (permalink)
bougeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,698
Thanks: 5,589
Thanked 6,741 Times in 3,780 Posts
See how good propaganda works? Iran isn't close to having a nuke yet morons talk about different scenarios on how we should attack.
stoneric is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stoneric For This Useful Post:
kameelyun (03-19-2010)
Old 03-19-2010, 05:34 PM   #26 (permalink)
SoK
mentally ill
 
SoK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,336
Thanks: 403
Thanked 1,019 Times in 658 Posts
^You want my honest opinion, Ahmadinejad is all talk (wiping out Israel), and I like him more than most Iranian citizens.

The last thing the US, Iran, and the world need is an invasion of Iran. Most liberals wanted an invasion of Iraq in 2002, because they believe hysteria just like anyone. I didn't...
SoK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 06:48 PM   #27 (permalink)
Cold School
 
cantSEEme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,615
Thanks: 280
Thanked 239 Times in 511 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry View Post
We will never end nuclear proliferation by building more nukes.

I can see the argument for letting them have it, but I still don't think "oh India and Pakistan have them" is a very good argument at all.

Not to mention that, yet again, nukes would be even more of a waste of money in a country that needs it more than ever.

End the sanctions, open actual relations, not political soapbox grandstanding, and feed the innocent majority caught up in this dick sizing competition, this is how we maintain peace. Not by building more genocidal weapons.
word, terry. but, i would like to add that we should also lead by example. even though we are part of that whole nuclear arms reduction plan, we are still sitting on a huge nuclear arsenal.
__________________
cantSEEme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 08:00 PM   #28 (permalink)
bougeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,698
Thanks: 5,589
Thanked 6,741 Times in 3,780 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ©antSEEme View Post
word, terry. but, i would like to add that we should also lead by example. even though we are part of that whole nuclear arms reduction plan, we are still sitting on a huge nuclear arsenal.
And to abide by the purpose of the NPT, not to mention our obligation, we should be reducing our stockpiles as we speak.
stoneric is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stoneric For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design