![]() |
|
|||||||
| Politics And Current Affairs Discussion on politics, current affairs and law. Do something today to make a difference. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
YaHookan
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: On the other side of your screen.
Posts: 253
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 35
Thanked 48 Times in 44 Posts
|
WHO swine flu experts 'linked' with drug companies
or maybe..
WHO caught in conflict of interest in farce about epidemic/promotion of antiviral drugs of questionable worth. Tamiflu Governments around the world stockpiled antiviral drugs. Key scientists behind World Health Organization advice on stockpiling of pandemic flu drugs had financial ties with companies which stood to profit, an investigation has found. The British Medical Journal says the scientists had openly declared these interests in other publications yet WHO made no mention of the links. It comes as a report from the Council of Europe criticised the lack of transparency around the handling of the swine flu pandemic. A spokesman for WHO said the drug industry did not influence its decisions on swine flu. Guidelines recommending governments stockpile antiviral drugs were issued by WHO in 2004. The advice prompted many countries around the world into buying up large stocks of Tamiflu, made by Roche, and Relenza manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. A year after the swine flu pandemic was declared, stocks are left unused in warehouses and governments are attempting to unpick contracts. Conflict of interest The BMJ, in a joint investigation with The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, found that three scientists involved in putting together the 2004 guidance had previously been paid by Roche or GSK for lecturing and consultancy work as well as being involved in research for the companies. It is common practice for academic experts to work closely with the pharmaceutical industry, such as getting funding for drug trials, or to be paid for attending meetings. On all clinical papers authors must publicly declare any competing interests. So it is surely advisable that the WHO follows the same policy with its advisors. And there is surely no logic in refusing to name the members of the emergency committee which advised the WHO about the pandemic. Although the scientists involved had freely declared the links in other places and said WHO asked for conflicts of interest forms prior to expert meetings, the ties were not publically declared by WHO. It is not clear whether these conflicts were notified privately by WHO to governments around the world, the BMJ said, and a request to see conflict of interest declarations was turned down. In addition, membership of the "emergency committee" which advised WHO's director general Margaret Chan on declaring an influenza pandemic has been kept secret. It means the names of the 16 committee members are known only to people within WHO, and as such their possible conflicts of interest with drug companies are unknown. On its website, WHO says: "Potential conflicts of interest are inherent in any relationship between a normative and health development agency, like WHO, and a profit-driven industry. "Similar considerations apply when experts advising the Organization have professional links with pharmaceutical companies. "Numerous safeguards are in place to manage possible conflicts of interest or their perception." ******************** ******************** *
__________________
"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes." -- Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court "Fifty men have run America, and thats a high figure." -- Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.[/CENTER] |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Clear Light
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In my head, somewhere.
Posts: 17,867
Thanks: 5,019
Thanked 5,421 Times in 2,865 Posts
|
I knew the whole Swine Flu thing was going to end badly (and not in terms of deaths from Swine Flu). What they need now is a vaccine for the Hysterical Media and Government Flu.
![]() The Rev |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to The Rev For This Useful Post: | Canuck Wisdom (06-05-2010) |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
UglyDucklingSyndrome
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,221
Thanks: 1,427
Thanked 514 Times in 378 Posts
|
Hey can you please provide a link for us so we can decide for ourselves the legitimacy of this article?
Just something Id like to do before I go repeating this info to anyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
UglyDucklingSyndrome
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,221
Thanks: 1,427
Thanked 514 Times in 378 Posts
|
Yea I remember reading that Donald Rumsfeld had investments in some of the companies producing Tamiflu before they closed and the 'pandemic' hit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
YaHookan
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: On the other side of your screen.
Posts: 253
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 35
Thanked 48 Times in 44 Posts
|
Quote:
Sorry I didn't post it originally. I usually do. Source Although, really, one source shouldn't be the deciding factor of validity. Cross referencing articles for a variety of views helps me decide if it's legitimate.
__________________
"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes." -- Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court "Fifty men have run America, and thats a high figure." -- Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.[/CENTER] Last edited by Entity; 06-05-2010 at 03:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|