![]() |
|
|||||||
| Politics And Current Affairs Discussion on politics, current affairs and law. Do something today to make a difference. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||
|
Voice of Reason
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Illinois
Posts: 8,361
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3,069 Times in 1,634 Posts
|
Giuliani caught supporting terrorists
Giuliani: The Terrorist Group I Supported Isn't Really a Terrorist Group
Rudy Giuliani and several former Bush Administration officials who were criticized last week for attending a rally for what the State Department says is a terrorist organization—which was probably illegal—have responded. They say their terror group doesn't count. Late last year, Giuliani, former attorney general Michael Mukasey, former homeland security secretary Tom Ridge, former Bush adviser Frances Frago Townsend, and angry walrus John Bolton all attended a rally in France for Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), a terrorist group waging guerrilla war against Iran. The MEK is on the State Department's list of terrorist organizations for, among other things, killing American soldiers and civilians in the 1970s, participating in the takeover of the U.S. embassy in Tehran, and helping Saddam Hussein commit atrocities against Iraq's Shiite population. They are also Marxists. So it's odd that a bunch of Bushie neocons would support them, no? On the other hand, they want to kill Iranian people, which Bush-era neocons also want to do, so there you have it. But there was a snag: It's a crime to materially support terrorist organizations, as attorney David Cole noted in a New York Times op-ed. And the Supreme Court—specifically, Chief Justice John Roberts—has adopted a rather expansive interpretation of what that means, including in some circumstances simple "advocacy" on behalf of a designated terror group. Which means Rudy Giuliani is a terrorist, QED. But Giuliani and his terror buddies have finally spoken out to explain their actions in a co-written National Review Online piece, and it comes down to: a) We didn't break the law, and b) the State Department is totally wrong and no fair! Firstly, they claim that the laws against material support for terror groups—which they applaud—don't make it a crime to just speak out in favor of one: Quote:
The other argument the terror sympathizers pull out in their defense is less nuanced: Quote:
P.S. It's worth noting that there is some controversy over whether the MEK's designation was fair. That doesn't mean you get to unilaterally second-guess the State Department's decisions, especially when your entire political career is dedicated to the idea that deviating a scintilla from the federal government's directives viz. terrorism constitutes treason.
__________________
Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought. -H. Bergson |
||
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Kompressor For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
|
Stoner
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,809
Thanks: 2,697
Thanked 773 Times in 578 Posts
|
wow, irritating, but not suprising
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|