Some statistics on the "poor" - Page 10

Kompressor · 09-20-2011, 08:09 PM

^ I'd thank you, but i'd rather continually tell you how awesome your advice is.

Roach · 09-20-2011, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Sorry Kompressor is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her.

Jewish Pork · 09-21-2011, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roach

They are less outspoken, fewer in number, and usually not as incorrect/well funded.

Says who?

**SageTree** · 09-21-2011, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roach

Quote:

Sorry Kompressor is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her.

Are you serious! That is AWESOME!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Nick Nasty

Yep I doubt that stats as presented. I've actually done research on Heritage and how it works. It is an idea-lobbying organization first and foremost, not academic. The Liberal foundations and idea mills are just as evil-just funded by a different end of the ruling class.

Thanks for adding this Dr. Nick.... pretty much summed up a lot of the bias/skew I was hoping to get at.

Jewish Pork · 09-21-2011, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SageTree

Are you serious! That is AWESOME!!!

Thanks for adding this Dr. Nick.... pretty much summed up a lot of the bias/skew I was hoping to get at.

Why don't you ask him to do the same check on any of DdC's links?

And glad to have you back

Dr. Nick Nasty · 09-21-2011, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roach

They are less outspoken, fewer in number, and usually not as incorrect/well funded.

The Ford Foundation, The Rockefeller Foundation, The Carnegie Foundation are all considered liberal foundations. They also fund CIA pet projects.

Quote:

Why don't you ask him to do the same check on any of DdC's links?

I would but they are too long and hurt my eyes (sorry bro, not meant as a diss). Regardless, I'm an anarchist, I don't have a dog in the fight as it exists. It's all kindof criminal to me.

Roach · 09-21-2011, 11:17 PM

nice try.

Rockefeller became a lifelong member of the then-new Republican Party, and a strong supporter of Abraham Lincoln and the party’s abolitionist wing.

pretty conservative for a "liberal"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...st_foundations

Dr. Nick Nasty · 09-22-2011, 02:26 PM

^not if we understand the Republican Party as a fundamentally corporate institution funded by burgeoning rail monopoly. Support for the abolitionist cause was seen as the opening up of a new (lower) wage labor pool-Rockefeller hardly was John Brown. Always remember the Republicans were the pro-Black rights party until the 1960s Nixon realignment. It can likely be argued that really until the 60s, the "liberal" economic party was actually the more socially backward one. Goldwater's wife was a booster of planned parenthood in its infancy.

Roach · 09-22-2011, 08:28 PM

Quote:

the "liberal" economic party was actually the more socially backward one.

09-20-2011, 08:09 PM	#181 (permalink)
Kompressor Voice of Reason Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Illinois Posts: 8,361 Thanks: 0 Thanked 3,069 Times in 1,634 Posts	^ I'd thank you, but i'd rather continually tell you how awesome your advice is. __________________ Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought. -H. Bergson

09-21-2011, 11:17 PM	#187 (permalink)
Roach Victoria Aut Mors Join Date: Dec 1999 Posts: 7,184 Thanks: 2,372 Thanked 1,987 Times in 1,509 Posts	nice try. Rockefeller became a lifelong member of the then-new Republican Party, and a strong supporter of Abraham Lincoln and the party’s abolitionist wing. pretty conservative for a "liberal" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...st_foundations __________________ לזיין את הקופים

09-22-2011, 02:26 PM	#188 (permalink)
Dr. Nick Nasty Reactionary Radical Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: New York/New Jersey Metro Wasteland Posts: 1,049 Blog Entries: 5 Thanks: 653 Thanked 364 Times in 232 Posts	^not if we understand the Republican Party as a fundamentally corporate institution funded by burgeoning rail monopoly. Support for the abolitionist cause was seen as the opening up of a new (lower) wage labor pool-Rockefeller hardly was John Brown. Always remember the Republicans were the pro-Black rights party until the 1960s Nixon realignment. It can likely be argued that really until the 60s, the "liberal" economic party was actually the more socially backward one. Goldwater's wife was a booster of planned parenthood in its infancy. __________________ "I do not wish any mass at all, but honest men only, lovely, sweet, accomplished women only."-Emma Goldman

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)